【摘要】 对“宏观调控”概念的界定,决定了宏观调控法制建构的差异。宏观调控应当遵循“分权”和“法治”的基本原则。中央政府宏观调控部门之间的分权制衡和协调、中央政府与地方政府之间调控权的合理划分,是有效分权的基本条件。宏观调控必须法治化,但是通过具体立法“固定规则”是不可行的,关键是对宏观调控主体适当赋权,由其根据形势和调控目标“相机抉择”或自由裁量,并将其纳入问责体系,凡宏观调控决策或行为超出合理专业判断造成不良后果的,行为人就应在民主和法治的框架内承担相应的责任。更多还原

【Abstract】 Different definitions of“Macro-control”lead to the different legal institution of it.Macro- control should comply with cardinal principles of“separation of powers”and“rule of law”.The deeentmlization, checks and balances and coordination of powers among Macro-control departments in central government,and the reasonable distribution of control powers between the central government and local governments,are the basic conditions of efficient separation of powers.Macro-control must be ruled of law,but it is infeasible to legislate how to Macro-control concretely.What is pivotal is to endue the Macro-control subject with proper discretion power exerted according to economic situation and the Macro-control target,and establish an accountability system for it.If the decision-making or behavior of Macro-control are against the business judgment rule and result in the hamfful consequence,the actor should assume corresponding liability for it within the framework of democracy and rule of law.更多还原