节点文献

多西他赛联合异环磷酰胺方案与多西他赛单药方案二线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌

A randomized phase Ⅱ trial of docetaxel/ifosfamide regimen versus single-agent docetaxel in second-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 崔成旭张湘茹朱允中杨树军张祥福徐光川黄诚刘端琪郑玉红储大同

【Author】 CUI Cheng-xu,ZHANG Xiang-ru,ZHU Yun-zhong,YANG Shu-jun,ZHANG Xiang-fu,XU Guang-chuan,HUANG Cheng,LIU Duan-qi,ZHENG Yu-hong,CHU Da-tong(Cancer Hospital and Institute,Peking Union Medical College,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing 100021,China)

【机构】 中国医学科学院中国协和医科大学肿瘤医院肿瘤研究所北京胸部肿瘤医院河南省肿瘤医院福建协和医院广州中山医科大学肿瘤医院福建省肿瘤医院北京军区总院赛诺菲-安万特公司中国医学科学院中国协和医科大学肿瘤医院肿瘤研究所 北京100021北京100021北京101149河南郑州450008福建福州350003广东广州510060福建福州350014北京100700上海200040

【摘要】 背景与目的:多西他赛(多西紫杉醇,进口药泰索帝,TXT)单药是晚期非小细胞肺癌二线治疗的标准治疗。本研究探讨多西他赛联合异环磷酰胺(IFO)方案与多西他赛单药治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效和不良反应。方法:随机对照研究56例非小细胞肺癌病例。共设立两组,T组:多西他赛单药方案;TI组:多西他赛联合异环磷酰胺方案。结果:PR:T组6例(23.0%);TI组7例(23.3%)。NC:T组9例(34.6%);TI组14例(46.7%)。PD:T组8例(30.8%);TI组8例(26.7%)。NE:T组3例(11.5%);TI组1例(3.3%)。两组相比,差异无显著性(P=0.6425)。1年生存率:T组21.2%;TI组22.0%。中位生存期:T组237.0 d;TI组226.0 d。两组相比,差异无显著性(P=0.8815)。中位肿瘤进展时间:T组157.1 d;TI组69.8 d。差异有显著统性(P=0.0039)。T组Ⅲ/Ⅳ度血小板减少为53.8%,TI组为16.7%,差异有非常显著性(P=0.0056)。T组Ⅲ/Ⅳ度中性粒细胞减少为65.4%,TI组为33.3%,差异有显著性(P=0.0137)。结论:多西他赛联合异环磷酰胺方案在非小细胞肺癌二线治疗中是安全、有效的,但是与多西他赛单药方案比较,有效率和生存期差异均无显著性。

【Abstract】 Background and purpose:The gold standard in second-line treatment of the advanced non-small-cell lung cancer which has proven activity in a randomized trial remains docetaxel.In this study we evaluated the overall response and side effects of docetaxel-ifosfamide regimen and docetaxel regimen in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.Methods:56 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer were randomized in the clinical trial.There were two arms.The patients in T arm received docetaxel single-agent and in TI arm docotaxel-ifosfamide regimen.Results:Only in 23.0% in the T arm and 3% in the TI arm were partial responses observed.Nine patients(34.6%) had stabilized disease in the Tarm and 14 patients(46.7%) in the TI arm.There was no significant statistical difference(P=0.6425).The 1-year survival rates were 21.2% in the T arm and 22.0% in the TI arm.Median survival for the patients in the T arm was(237.0) days and 226.0 days in the TI arm(P=0.0039).Grade Ⅲ/Ⅳ thrombocytopenia was 53.8% in the T arm and(16.7%) in the TI arm(P=0.0056).Grade Ⅲ/Ⅳ neutral leucopenia was 65.4% in the T arm and 33.3% in the TI arm(P=(0.0137)).Conclusions:Non-platinum regimens such as docetaxel-ifosfamide could be used as second line treatment for the patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer,they have demonstrated efficacy and safety.There are no significant differences in terms of response rates and survival in docetaxel-ifosfamide doublet and docetaxel single agent.

  • 【文献出处】 中国癌症杂志 ,China Oncology , 编辑部邮箱 ,2006年10期
  • 【分类号】R734.2
  • 【被引频次】22
  • 【下载频次】224
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络