节点文献

高校学术评价中的过度量化现象及其有效控制

The Phenomenon of Over-quantification During Academic Appraisal in Colleges and Its Effective Manipulative Measures

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 杨冠英

【Author】 Yang Guan-ying(The Periodical Society of Xinxiang Medical College,Xinxiang 453003,P.R.China)

【机构】 新乡医学院期刊社 河南新乡453003

【摘要】 学术评价中适度量化模式管理是必要的,但不可过度。过度量化模式管理导致“量化模式崇拜”在我国高校(含医学院校)盛行。在量化模式管理仍在实施或者说仍需改造的当下,应将原创性、前沿性作为学术评价的核心指标,应将高质量、高水平作为学术评价的重要标准,应将同行评价和同质评价相结合、定量评价和定性评价相结合等作为学术评价的基本原则。高校教师要时刻牢记“学术乃天下公器,学术研究者乃社会良心”,要耐得住清贫和寂寞,不随波逐流,不人云亦云,不见利忘义,始终保持内心的自由和独立的人格。

【Abstract】 In the academic appraisalthe moderate quantification is necessary,but not excessive.The phenomenon of over-quantification during academic appraisal results in that worshiping the quantificational mode is prevailing in our colleges including medical colleges.When the quantification administration is still in the implementation or still had to transform immediately,we shall try hard to do the following items.First,origination and innovation are the nuclear standards of academic appraisal,while the higher quality and level are its important guidelines.Second,there are two basic principles in academic appraisal,one is the combination of craft brother estimation and consubstantial estimation,the other is the combination of quantificational estimation and qualitative estimation.So college teachers must bear firmly in mind that "Academic is the world rule,the academic researcher is the social conscience."They must endure poverty and loneliness,not blindly follow and forget honor at the sight of profits as well as maintain the innermost feelings throughout the freedom and the independent personality.

【基金】 河南省教育科学规划“十五”重点项目(JKGHAZ--204)
  • 【文献出处】 新乡医学院学报 ,Journal of Xinxiang Medical College , 编辑部邮箱 ,2006年02期
  • 【分类号】G644
  • 【被引频次】5
  • 【下载频次】163
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络