【摘要】 目的:分析时间管理倾向与大学生主观幸福感之间的关系,探讨其是否具有较强的预测作用。方法:2005/2006-05抽取川北医学院和西华师范大学学生1～4年级学生600名,同时进行主观幸福感和时间管理倾向问卷调查,时间管理倾向问卷选用黄希庭等编制的时间管理倾向量表熏量表由时间价值感、时间监控观和时间效能感3个分量表所组成熏全量表共44个项目。量表按1～5点等级计分。得分越高就表明个体的时间管理倾向水平越高。主观幸福感量表采用自编的幸福感量表,包括总体主观幸福感、生活满意度、积极情感和消极情感4个分量表。施测方式为集体调查,调查主要在教室进行。结果:发放问卷600份,经严格筛选,选出合格问卷558份,有效率为93%。男256名,女302名;年龄18～23岁,平均年龄(20.2±1.5)岁。①在时间管理倾向上,从时间价值感、时间监控观、时间效能感3个维度的得分看,女生分数都高于男生分数。但只有时间效能感评分差异有显著性意义(35.54±7.97熏31.45±5.53熏P<0.05)。②女生总体幸福感评分显著高于男生(30.265±7.33熏27.324±6.12熏P<0.05),而且女生生活满意度和积极情感2个维度评分也显著高于男生(17.892±5.75熏16.365±5.68;27.976±6.88熏26.180±6.92熏P<0.05),男、女生消极情感评分差异无显著性(P>0.05)。③大学生时间管理倾向与主观幸福感相关分析发现时间管理倾向与总体主观幸福感、生活满意度和积极情感存在显著的正相关(r=0.285熏0.376熏0.506熏P<0.01),与消极情感存在显著负相关穴r=-0.202熏P<0.01雪。而且在时间价值观、时间监控观和时间效能感上也存在同样趋势。④多元回归分析发现,时间价值感、时间效能感和时间监控观对总体幸福感构成显著的回归效应,并且时间效能感上具有最大的偏回归系数(β=0.558熏P=0.000)。时间价值感和时间效能感与生活满意度和积极情感构成显著回归效应,且时间效能感与消极情感也构成显著的回归效应。结论:时间管理倾向是衡量主观幸福感最好的预测指标。更多还原

【Abstract】 AIM: To analyze the relation of time management tendency with subjective well-being (SWB) of university students, and explore whether time management tendency has the stronger estimation.METHODS: From 2005 to May 2006, 600 grade 1-4 students of Sichuan North Medical College and China West Normal University were selected to carry out the survey on SWB and time management tendency by questionnaires at the same time. Time management tendency questionnaire was compiled by Huang Xi-ting et al, and constituted by three dimensions of time value feeling, time supervision feeling and time effect feeling; totally 44 items and 5 grades. The higher scores indicated the higher levels of time management tendency in the individual. SWB was measured by the self-compiled questionnaires, consisting of four subscales: total SWB, living satisfaction, positive emotion and negative emotion. The measurements were conducted collectively in the classroom.RESULTS: Six hundreds questionnaires were issued, and 558 ones were selected as qualified by strict sieving, including 256 males and 302 females, aged 18-23 years and mean (20.2±1.5) years, with the effective rate of 93%.As for the time management tendency, the females students showed higher scores than male students in three dimensions, and only time effect feeling demonstrated significant differences (35.54±7.97, 31.45±5.53, P < 0.05).②On the total SWB, the scores of female students were markedly higher than those of male students (30.265±7.33, 27.324±6.12, P < 0.05), and there were also significantly increased scores in females than in males on the living satisfaction and positive emotion (17.892±5.75, 16.365±5.68; 27.976±6.88, 26.180±6.92, P < 0.05), while the scores of negative emotion had not the sexual difference (P > 0.05).③The time management tendency was positively related with the total SWB, living satisfaction and positive emotion noticeably (r=0.285, 0.376, 0.506, P < 0.01), and negatively with negative emotion noticeably (r=-0.202, P < 0.01). And the same trend was found in time value, time supervision and time effect feelings.④The multiple regression analysis implied that, the time value, time effect and time supervision feelings had the significant regression effects on the total SWB, and showed the biggest partial regression coefficient in time effect feeling (β=0.558, P=0.000). Both time value feeling and time effect feeling constituted significant regression effects on the living satisfaction and positive emotion, and so did time effect feeling with negative emotion. CONCLUSION: Time management tendency is the best estimating index to measure SWB.更多还原