【摘要】 现行《物权法(草案)》内容缺乏创新,在体系上表面严谨实质松散,无法面对财产的无体性引起的债权物权化等趋势。因此依照全面比较的研究方法,英美“财产法”应成为我们的借鉴之一。因为物权法制定的根本目的就在于保护社会中的财产权利,而法律移植的应当是精神而不是形式,何况德国物权法的创立有其自身的特定历史环境,在我国实际也没有深入人心。建立我们自己的物权法应当以《民法通则》作为理论和传统依据,从保护使用价值走向鼓励实现交换价值。更多还原

【Abstract】 The current Draft Law on Rights in rem is outdated in its content, seemingly well-knit but actually loose in structure and, as such, can not meet the requirements resulting from the incorporeal nature of property, such as the transformation of obligational rights into rights in rem. Therefore, the Anglo-American property law should be taken as the main reference in the drafting of the Law on Rights in rem in China. The purpose of the Law is to protect property rights, and in the transplantation of law, it is the spirit, rather than the form, of law that should be transplanted. The German law on rights in rem is made in its specific historical context, which is lacking in China. The drafting of the Law on Rights in China should take the General Principles of Civil Law as its theoretical and traditional bases, so as to change its purpose from the protection of the use value to the realization of exchange value.更多还原