节点文献

我国物权立法借鉴的理性选择与反思——兼对《物权法(草案)》的回应

Reference for China’s Legislation on Rights in rem: Rational Choicesand Reflections

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 余能斌;

【Author】 Yu Nengbin

【机构】 武汉大学法学院 教授;

【摘要】 我国物权立法应选择最适合我国实际,又是当代最先进的立法经验为我所用。物权立法可以从英国财产法中获取有益的经验,也可以从俄罗斯立法经验中获得启示。我国物权法草案无论在内容上还是立法技术上都存在一些不足,应加以完善。

【Abstract】 In drafting the law on Rights in rem, China should take as reference the most advanced legislative experiences abroad, which shall be most suited to the conditions of the country. In this process, the UK law on property and legislative experience from Russia can provide us with much useful food. The Draft Law on Right of Things now under discussions in China still has much to improve, both in terms of its content and legislative techniques. The author has proposed several points for further improvement of the draft.

【关键词】 物权; 物权立法; 财产法;
  • 【文献出处】 环球法律评论 ,Global Law Review , 编辑部邮箱 ,2006年01期
  • 【分类号】D923.2
  • 【被引频次】4
  • 【下载频次】471
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络