节点文献

舒适状况量表的信效度测试研究

The study of testing the content validity and the internal consistency of general comfort questionnaire

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 朱丽霞高凤莉罗虹辉邓海波王秋俐

【Author】 ZHU Li-xia, GAO Feng-li, LUO Hong-hui, DENG Hai-bo, WANG Qiu-li. The Clinical Nursing Staff Room of Nursing Department, Fujian Putian College, Putian 351100, China

【机构】 福建省莆田学院护理系临床护理教研室北京协和医院

【摘要】 目的检测美国舒适护理专家Kolcaba研制的简化的舒适状况量表(GCQ)在中国文化背景下的适用性。方法研究分两个阶段进行,第一阶段将量表翻译成中文后由5位护理专家对其进行内容效度的检验。第二阶段进行问卷调查,测试不同患者对各个项目用词的理解,强化 GCQ量表的信效度,并应用简化GCQ检测胸外科术后48 h患者的舒适度。问卷分2期进行,首轮20例胸外科术后48 h的患者参与问卷测试,次轮123例。结果简化GCQ的内容效度CVI= 0.86,Cronbach’s α值为0.92,各维度α值波动在0.53~0.85。胸外科术后48 h患者的舒适状况得分为(91.27±8.63)分(为中高度舒适),生理维度平均单项得分最低为(2.50±0.47)分,心理精神维度平均单项得分最高为(3.26±0.35)分。结论Kolcaba简化的GCQ量表适合在我国使用,但其信度和效度有待进一步研究给予全面肯定。

【Abstract】 To translate the Kolcaba brief general comfort questionnaire (GCQ) to Chinese and measure the applicability under the Chinese culture background. Methods This study was composed by two phases, the first phase was to measure the content validity of brief GCQ by 5 nursing specialist after GCQ was translated into Chinese. The second phase was to testing the reliability of the brief GCQ by investigating patients when they had undergone chest surgery operation before 48 hours. Results The overall CVI of brief GCQ was 0.86, the Cronbach’s a was 0.92, the subscale α was from 0.53 to 0.85. The total GCQ score about patients with chest surgery was 91.27±8.63. The lowest mean score was physical subscale: 2. 50±0. 47, the highest mean score was psychological sub-scale: 3.26±0.35. Conclusion The Kolcaba brief GCQ fit to use in China, but its content validity and the internal consistency should be tested in future study.

【关键词】 舒适信度效度
【Key words】 ComfortReliabilityValidity
  • 【文献出处】 中国实用护理杂志 ,Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing , 编辑部邮箱 ,2006年13期
  • 【分类号】R472
  • 【被引频次】497
  • 【下载频次】2695
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络