节点文献

3国不同粉尘采样器测定结果的比较

Comparison of Different Sampling Methods for Determining Dust Concentration

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 毛革诗梁娇君卢明李翠玲陈振龙杨磊

【Author】 MAO Ge-shi1,LIANG Jiao-jun1,LU Ming1,LI Cui-ling1,CHEN Zhen-long1,YANG Lei2*(1.Wuhan Hospital for Occupational Diseases prevention and treatment,Wuhan 430071,China;2.School of Public Health,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430030,China)

【机构】 武汉市职业病防治院华中科技大学同济医学院公共卫生学院 武汉430071武汉430071武汉430030

【摘要】 [目的]比较研究3国不同粉尘采样器的测定结果。[方法]采用中国、美国和德国总尘和呼尘采样器在武昌造船厂的清铲和造型车间于呼吸带高度进行平行采样8d,并测定总尘、呼尘浓度。[结果]中国、美国、德国的总尘和呼尘采样器的测定结果具有一定的相关性(P<0.05)。但中国总尘采样器的测定结果与美国、德国的结果有差异(P<0.05);而呼尘间无差异(P>0.05)。[结论]我国呼尘采样测定结果与国外采样器测定结果具有可比性。

【Abstract】 [ Objective] Comparative studies on the dust concentration with different sampling methods. [ Methods] We determined the dust contention in the Wuchang shipyard for 8 days with different sampling instruments,i.e. total dust and respirable dust samplers from China,Germany and USA. All the samplers were located in the workplace at a height of respiratory zone,to make a parallel sampling. [ Results] Using the samplers from China/Germany/USA,there was correlation between the result of total dust and that of respirable dust. There was significiant difference in the results of total dust between the Chinese instruments and German or USA instruments(P < 0.05),but no significant difference among the results of respirable dust sampled by threes kinds of samplers(P > 0.05). [ Conclution] The results of respirable dust suggested that Chinese instrument was comparable with Germany and USA instruments.

  • 【文献出处】 环境与职业医学 ,Journal of Environmental & Occupational Medicine , 编辑部邮箱 ,2006年03期
  • 【分类号】R136
  • 【被引频次】6
  • 【下载频次】96
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络