【摘要】 目的探讨焦虑障碍与抑郁障碍人格基础是否相同。方法对30例焦虑障碍和30例抑郁障碍患者应用加利福尼亚心理调查表进行评定,并与30名正常人进行对比分析。结果焦虑组Do、Cs、Sy、Sp、Sa、In、Em高于抑郁组(P<0．01),抑郁组Sc、Gi、To高于焦虑组(P<0．01);焦虑组除Em高于正常对照组(P<0．01)外,In、Re、So、Sc、Gi、Cm、To、Ac、Ai、Ie、Py均低于正常对照组(P<0．05或P<0．01);抑郁组Sc、To、Fx与正常对照组差异无显著性,其余各量表分均低于正常对照组。各组人格类型构成分布有极显著性差异(P<0．01)。焦虑组和抑郁组的自我实现水平均低于正常对照组(P<0．01)。结论焦虑障碍和抑郁障碍的自我确认和人际适应水平以及人格类型不同。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To explore the personality basis in patients with anxiety and depression. Methods 30 patients with anxiety and 30 ones with depression were assessed with California Psychological Inventory (CPI) and compared with 30 health persons. Results Scores of such subscales as Do,Cs,Sy,Sp,Sa,In and Em were higher in the anxiety than in the depression group(P<0. 01) ,and those of Sc, Gi and To higher in the depression than in the anxiety group(P<0. 01) ; the score of Em was higher(P<0. 01) and that of the other subscale lower(P<0. 05 or 0. 01) in the anxiety than in the control group; scores of Sc, To and Fx had no differences in the depression from those in the control group, while those of the other subscales were lower. There was most significant difference in structural distribution of personality among the 3 groups(P<0. 01). Levels of self-actualization was lower in both anxiety and depression groups than in the control group(P<0. 01). Conclusion Anxiety has differences in self-identity, interpersonal adaptation and personality type.更多还原