节点文献

输尿管结石原位ESWL与URL的疗效比较

The curative effect of ureteral stone: comparison between ESWL and URL

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 韩海董诚李逊钟浩光吴志坚

【Author】 HAN Hai1 DONG Cheng2 lI Xun3 ZHONG Haoguang1 WU Zhijian1 (1Liaobu Hospital, Dongguan, Guangdong, 523400, China; 2Urology Hospital, Dongguan, Guangdong Province; 3Minimally Invasive Surgical Center , the First Affiliate Hospital, Guangzhou Medical College, Guangzhou)

【机构】 寮步医院外科东莞市泌尿医院广州医学院第一附属医院微创外科中心寮步医院外科 广东东莞523400广东东莞

【摘要】 目的比较输尿管结石的原位ESWL与气压弹道碎石术(URL)的综合疗效。方法对经ESWL治疗1458例和URL治疗1308例的临床资料进行比较分析。结果ESWL总排净率为97.67%,高于URL总的排净率76.15%(P<0.05);ESWL平均治疗时间27min,排净时间4.2天,费用1350元,零住院天数,均低于URL的平均治疗时间35min、排净时间14天、费用4470元和住院天数4.3天(P<0.05)。结论ESWL的有效率和安全性优于URL,是一种高效、安全、痛苦且损伤少、经济负担轻的治疗方法。

【Abstract】 Objective:To evaluate the curative effect of ureteral stone comparing between extracorporal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL) and ureteroscopic lithotripsy(URL).Methods:Retrospective analysis was done in 1458 cases of ureteral stone which were treated with ESWL and 1308 cases of ureteral stone which were treated with URL.Results:The total cure rate of ESWL and URL were 97.67 % and 76.15 %.Conclusions:ESWL is an effective ,safe, lesscost and less tramatic method for treatment of ureteral stone.

【关键词】 输尿管结石碎石术
【Key words】 Ureteral stoneLithotripsy
  • 【文献出处】 临床泌尿外科杂志 ,Journal of Clinical Urology , 编辑部邮箱 ,2006年04期
  • 【分类号】R699
  • 【被引频次】9
  • 【下载频次】44
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络