【摘要】 目的调查工读男生与普通男生人格特征及其父母教养方式的差异,并探究二者的关系。方法用艾森克人格问卷(EPQ)考查工读男生与普通男生人格特征的差异,用父母教养方式评价量表(EMBU)考查工读男生与普通男生父母教养方式的差异。结果1工读男生在P、E、N和L4种人格特征上,与普通男生之间均存在显著差异。2工读男生在FF1、MF1、FF3、FF5和FF65种父母教养方式上,与普通男生之间存在显著差异。3工读男生人格特征的N分与父母教养方式中的FF2、FF3、FF5正相关显著,L分与MF3负相关显著;普通男生人格特征的P分与父母教养方式中的FF2、MF2、MF4正相关显著,N分与FF2、FF5、FF6正相关显著。结论工读生的人格发展具有显著不良倾向;这与其所受不良的父母教养方式有关。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the difference between male Gong -du students and common male students for their personality characteristic and parental reari ng style and their relationships. Methods Using EPQ to examine subjects person ality characteristic, and using the EMBU questionnaire to investigate the parent al rearing style of subjects. Results (1)There are significant difference between male Gong-du students and common male students on psychotici sm, introvision and extrovision, neuroticism and lying. (2)There are significant difference between male Gong-du students and common male students on parental rearing style of FF1, MF1, FF3, FF5 and FF6. (3)For male Gong-du students, ther e are obvious positive correlations between neuroticism and FF2, FF3, FF5, and o bvious negative correlation between lying and MF3. For common male students, the re are positive correlations between psychoticism and FF2, MF2, MF4, positive co rrelations between neuroticism and FF2, FF5, FF6. Conclusion Gong-du students’ pe rsonality development showed impropriety and was associated with improper parent al rearing style.更多还原