节点文献
预期违约制度与不安抗辩权制度比较研究
A Comparative Study of the System of Anticipatory Breach of a Contract and that of Insecure Pleading Rights
【摘要】 预期违约制度和不安抗辩权制度是合同法律制度的重要内容,具备完善的预期违约制度或不安抗辩制度有利于合同当事人顺利履行合同,保障合同目的的实现。由于此,该两项制度被世界各国的合同立法以及相关国际公约所重视。我国《合同法》则同时规定了这两项制度。但在有关问题上却存在一些不同看法。因此有必要对二者进行比较研究以澄清认识上的误区。
【Abstract】 The system of anticipatory breach of a contract and that of insecure pleading right are important parts of the contract law system.These two rules contribute to the complete performance of a contract and the achievement of the goal of a contract.And owning to this,national legislations of countries all over the world and international conventions attach great importance to them.The contract law of China also employed these two rules,but there are different opinions about it.This paper will shed some light on issues about it.
- 【文献出处】 湖北经济学院学报 ,Journal of Hubei University of Economics , 编辑部邮箱 ,2006年06期
- 【分类号】D913
- 【被引频次】1
- 【下载频次】408