【摘要】 在将人格视为人之根本的人文主义理想与权利客体理论矛盾的背景下,为了实现对人格的全面保护,我国学者采用了“人格利益”这一抽象概念作为人格权与人格权法律关系之客体。虽然这在一定程度上实现了通过权利模式对于人格的保护,但是由于“人格利益”概念本身的模糊性和对于人格理论的依赖性,人格利益作为人格权法律关系之客体具有根本性的缺陷。无论从当代法学之哲理基础还是从社会历史发展的现实来看,人格要素都是独立于法律上的主体的,因此人格要素作为人格权、人格权法律关系之客体,不仅不存在障碍,而且具有重大的理论与现实意义。更多还原

【Abstract】 With the background of the contrary of the theory of the object of rights and the humanist idea of personality is the essence of person, Chinese legal researchers create the abstract concept "personality interest" as the objects of the personality rights and the personality rights legal relationship to achieve the objective of protecting the personality. Although the personality is protected through the rights form, an ultimate defect is in the concept of the "personality interest"because of its illegibility and the depending on the theory of the personality. From both aspect of the philosophic base and the social history, the element of personality is independent upon the legal subject, accordingly, it is significant both on theory and practice to define the element of personality as the object of the personality right legal relationship.更多还原