【摘要】 哈贝马斯在批判继承马尔库塞之“科学技术与身俱来就是意识形态”的基础上,将科学技术指认为一种新型的意识形态,从而丧失了对科学技术之本质的理解;哈贝马斯超越了马尔库塞对意识形态合理性的单向度论证,确立了意识形态合理性的人际交往的新向度,但是,由于脱离了社会关系,这一新的向度最终被消解在工具理性之中;哈贝马斯指证马尔库塞立足于技术本身为人类开拓自由空间的非现实性,找寻到了“自由讨论”这一新途径,但是由于忽视了资本主义社会这个大前提,导致其提供的新方案最终成为空中楼阁。更多还原

【Abstract】 Based on the critical inheritance of Herbert Marcuse’s view that science and technology is born to be ideology,Habermas regarded science and technology as a new type of ideology,which resulted in a lack of understanding of the essence of science and technology.Habermas established a new dimension of interpersonal relationship,which exceeded Marcuse’s one-dimensional demonstration on the rationality of ideology.However,this new dimension was finally replaced by purposive rationality because social relationship was not considered.Harbemas proved the non-reality of Marcuse’s belief that human being can open up space for free development by utilizing technology,then he proposed a new method——free discussion.However,the new method could not be realized because it ignored the background of capitalist society.更多还原