【摘要】 本文由悖论非存在定理之引理推得一个重要推论———所谓“悖论”既有可能是非真非假的单义句也有可能是多义句 ,并进而论证了所有典型“语义悖论”均属后一种情况 ,根本就不是什么真正意义上的悖论 ,从而彻底修正了克里普克的有关理论。更多还原

【Abstract】 Every sentence that brings a paradox is not a proposition,but is either a definite sentence truth-value of which is not true and not false or an ambiguous sentence.The sentences that bring typical semantic paradoxes are all ambiguous.Therefore the reasoning of typical semantic paradoxes purely is misuse of Logic.Therefore S.Kripke’s theory about typical semantic paradoxes must be modified.更多还原