节点文献

美罗培南与泰能随机对照治疗细菌性感染的临床评价(英文)

A randomized,controlled clinical trial on meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin for the treatment of bacterial infections

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 侯芳李家泰吴国平郑波陈亦芳顾俊明王慧玲霍丽薛欣贾长绪尹永红田晓峰任双义

【Author】 HOU Fang , LI Jiatai , WU Guoping , ZHENG Bo , CHEN Yifang GU Junming , WANG Huiling , HUO Li , XUE Xin , JIA Changxu YIN Yonghong , TIAN Xiaofeng and REN Shuangyi The Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, First Affiliated Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100034, China (Hou F, Li JT, Wu GP, Zheng B and Chen YF) Department of Respiratory Disease, Second Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116023, China (Gu JM, Wang HL, Huo L, Xue X, Jia CX, Yin YH, Tian XF and Ren SY)

【机构】 北京大学第一医院临床药理研究所大连医科大学第二附属医院呼吸内科大连医科大学第二附属医院呼吸内科 北京100034北京100034大连116023大连116023

【摘要】 目的 评价美罗培南的安全性和有效性。方法 共入选 182例 ,其中试验组 90例 ,疗效评价 70例 ,不良反应评价 72例 ;对照组 92例 ,疗效评价 70例 ,不良反应评价 70例。给药方法为美罗培南 5 0 0mg/次 ,Q12h (必要时 1g ,Q12h) ,静脉点滴 30分钟 ;泰能 (亚胺培南 /西司他丁 ,5 0 0mg/5 0 0mg) ,5 0 0mg/次 ,Q 12h(必要时 1g ,Q12h) ,静脉点滴 30分钟 ,疗程均为 7- 14天。结果 两药临床有效率分别为 90 %与 87% ,细菌清除率分别为 86% (5 5 /64)和 86% (5 7/66) ,76% (93/12 3)的临床分离致病菌进行株致病菌产β 内酰胺酶阳性。不良反应发生率分别为 9.7% (7/72 )与 8.6% (6/70 )。以上结果经统计学处理无显著差异 (P >0 .0 5 )。结论 美罗培南治疗细菌性感染 (包括酶菌感染 )安全有效。

【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of meropenem in Chinese patients, we conducted a study for the treatment of patients with lower respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections and other infections Methods A total of 182 hospitalized patients were enrolled in the study 90 patients received 500 mg meropenem every 12 hours (or 1 g every 12 hours if necessary) and 92 patients received imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg/500 mg every 12 hours (or 1 g every 12 hours if necessary) by intravenous infusion The duration of treatment was 7-14 days for both groups Results Seventy of 90 cases receiving meropenem and 70 of 92 cases receiving imipenem/cilastatin were assessable for clinical efficacy The overall efficacy rates were 90% for the meropenem group and 87% for the imipenem/cilastatin group, and the bacterial eradication rates were 86% in both groups 93 (76%) of 123 strains isolated from patients produced β lactamases Adverse drug reactions were evaluated in 72 cases in the meropenem group and 70 cases in the imipenem/cilastatin group The adverse drug reaction rates were 9 7% and 8 6%, respectively The results showed that there were no statistical differences between these two groups ( P >0 05) Conclusion Meropenem is effective and safe for the treatment of bacterial infections caused mainly by beta lactamase producing strains

【关键词】 美罗培南泰能感染
【Key words】 meropenem·imipenem/cilastatin·infection
  • 【文献出处】 Chinese Medical Journal ,中华医学杂志(英文版) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2002年12期
  • 【分类号】R515
  • 【被引频次】5
  • 【下载频次】186
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络