节点文献

胃癌超声内镜分期和术中分期之比较

Endoscopoic Ultrasonography and Operative Staging of Gastric Carcinoma: a Comparison with Histopathological Staging.

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 陈明敏朱正纲张俊李琛燕敏尹浩然林言箴

【Author】 CHEN Minmin, ZHU Zhenggang, ZHANG Jun, et al. Department of Surgery, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Second Medical University, Shanghai(200025)

【机构】 上海第二医科大学附属瑞金医院外科上海消化外科研究所上海消化外科研究所 200025200025200025

【摘要】 目的 :比较内镜超声 (EUS)和手术时触摸法对判断胃癌浸润深度及胃周淋巴结转移的准确性。方法 :73例经病理证实的胃癌病例 ,于术前接受EUS检查并在术时按Rhode原则进行评估 ,其结果与术后组织病理分期学相比较。结果 :在判断胃癌浸润深度 (T)上 ,EUS的准确性为 80 .8% (5 9/ 73) ,手术时评估的准确性为 5 8.9% (4 3/ 73)。在判断淋巴结转移 (N)上 ,前者的准确性为 6 0 .3% ,后者为 6 5 .8% ;但在 2 6例N0病例中 ,EUS分期的准确性为92 .3%而手术时评估的准确性仅为 5 7.7%。结论 :EUS判断胃癌的T及N0 ,较术中临床评估更为准确

【Abstract】 Objective: To compare the relative accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)and intra-operative clinical judgement in evaluating the depth of invasion(T)and extension of lymph node involvement(N)in patients with gastric cancer. Methods: From January through December 2000, 73 consecutive cases were studied by pre-operative EUS and intra-operative assessment for T and N. Results: For T, the assessment was made correctly by EUS in 59 patients(80.8%), and by clinical judgement alone in 43 patients(58.9%). For the assessment of N, EUS was accurate in 44 patients(60.3%), and linical judgement was correct in 48 cases(65.8%); however, in 26 patients proved pathologically to have no lymph node in volvement(N0), 24(92.3%) were correctly assessed by EUS and 15(57.7%) by clinical evaluation only. Conclusions: EUS is more accurate in assessing T and N0 of gastric cancer.

【关键词】 超声内镜手术分期准确性
【Key words】 EUS Surgical assessment Accuracy
  • 【文献出处】 外科理论与实践 ,Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice , 编辑部邮箱 ,2002年03期
  • 【分类号】R735.2
  • 【被引频次】11
  • 【下载频次】47
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络