节点文献

膝、肘关节骨折及功能重建的两种治疗方法对比观察

Clinical effect of different treatment on knee or elbow joint fracture

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 张成顺张元民刘书成赵晓伟张卫红高峰王丹

【Author】 Zhang Chengshun;Zhang Yuanmin;Liu Shucheng et al

【机构】 济宁医学院附属医院济宁医学院附属医院 山东济宁 272129山东济宁 272129山东济宁 272129

【摘要】 为探讨膝、肘关节碎性骨折的两种不同疗法的应用价值。对手术治疗的54例膝、肘关节内骨折,随机分为改良AO张力带固定组(A组)和传统治疗方法组(B组)进行对比观察。A组内固术中测试、关节活动度正常,骨折块无移位为固定可靠;术后石膏固定者,平关节面横行折断石膏托,消除有害旋转应力,关节在轴位功能锻炼恢复。术后随访1~12个月,A组骨折愈合时间2~4个月,骨折愈合率95.8%;B组骨折愈合时间3~6个月,骨折愈合率83.3%。两组骨折愈合率及关节功能恢复情况具有显著性差异(P<0.01)。认为影响膝、肘关节功能的开放性粉碎性骨折,应清创同时解剖复位,采用改良AO张力带固定,术后强化功能锻炼能促进骨折愈合及关节功能的恢复。

【Abstract】 To investigate the clinical effect of different treatment of knee or elbow joint fracture. 54 caseswere randomly divided into two groups (group A and B). 24 cases of group A fixed with tension strap and mostfractures were repositioned to recover the joint mobility in operation. Post-operation plasters were broken off inorder to eliminate harmful torsion stress,after then joints were exercised on axis position. All cases were followedup 1 to 12 months,The average fracture convalescont period of group A was 2 to 4 months,and the cure rate was95. 8%,group B was 3 to 6 months,and the cure rate was 83. 3%. There was significant difference between thetwo groups (P<0. 01). Comminuted fractures impairing joint function especially the opened wound should beanatomically repositioned and fixed with tension strap. Joint exercises can promote recovery for the post-operation patients.

【关键词】 粉碎骨折骨愈合关节功能
【Key words】 KneeElbowComminuted fractureFracture healingJoint function
  • 【文献出处】 山东医药 ,Shandong Medical Journal , 编辑部邮箱 ,2002年30期
  • 【分类号】R687.3
  • 【下载频次】28
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络