【摘要】 对国家行政赔偿救济额度 ,我国的国家赔偿立法采用了“半免责”的法律机制设置 ,而明显低于民事侵权赔偿救济 ,在某种程度上已限制了我国行政诉讼的发展并形成掣肘。文章认为 ,行政侵权赔偿 ,不仅应赔偿直接损害 ,而且对间接损害也应救济 ;不仅应赔偿客观的物质损害 ,对精神损害也应赔偿 ,考虑到行政侵权客观的表现形式 ,对于因限制人身自由的间接受害者的精神损害如已造成严重后果的 ,应考虑予以赔偿更多还原

【Abstract】 Chinese state compensation legislation adopts the institution of a legal mechanism of "half exemption" as to the remedial amount of state administrative compensation, which is obviously lower than the remedies available through civil tort compensation. To some extent, it has restricted the development of administrative litigation and has become an impediment. This article proposes that administrative tort remedy should not only compensate for direct losses but also indirect losses, not only the objective physical damages but also mental damages. Considering the objective forms of administrative tort, if serious consequences occur in the case of mental damages of indirect victims resulting from restricting personal freedom, compensation should also be considered.更多还原