【摘要】 目的 :观察比较内淋巴囊减压与切开术的疗效。方法 :在全麻下按常规手术方法分别行内淋巴囊减压术 2 3例 ,内淋巴囊切开术 2 2例。结果 :术后随访 4 1例 ,随访时间均在 2年以上 ,其中内淋巴囊减压术 2 1例 ,内淋巴囊切开术 2 0例。 2 1例内淋巴囊减压术患者中 ,A级 1 3例 ,B级 4例 ,C级 3例 ,D级 1例 ,完全控制率为6 1 .9% ;2 0例内淋巴囊切开术患者中 ,A级 1 2例 ,B级 5例 ,C级 2例 ,D级 1例 ,完全控制率为 6 0 .0 %。结论 :内淋巴囊减压与切开术在疗效上无显著差异 ,但内淋巴囊减压术较切开术具有操作简单、安全可靠、并发症少等优点 ,因此在术式选择上我们更偏向于内淋巴囊减压术更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective:We compared the curative effect between endolymphytic sac decompression and incision of endolymphytic sac to explore a simple, effective surgical way with less complication.Method: 23 endolymphatic sac decompression and 22 incision of endolymphatic sac were performed routinely under general anesthesia.Result: 41 of 45 patients were followed up more than 2 years after the surgical procedure, 21 of which received endolymphatic sac decompression, while others received incision of endolymphatic sac. According to Chinese Meniere disease’s diagnosis and curative effect standard evaluation criteria tried out in 1996, 13 got grade A(completely controlled), 4 got grade B(fundamentally controlled), 3 got grade C(partially controlled) while 1 got grade D(not controlled) among 21 patients who received endolymphatic sac decompression. The fully control rate is 61.9%. Among 20 patients who received incision of endolymphatic sac, 12 got grade A(completely controlled), 5 got grade B(fundamentally controlled),2 got grade C(partially controlled) while 1 got grade D(not controlled).The fully control rate is 60%.Conclusion: There is no significant difference between endolymphatic sac decompression and incision of endolymphatic sac in curative effect,but endolymphatic sac decompression is more convenient,safe and has less complication compared with incision of endolymphatic sac.From this,we favor endolymphatic sac decompression in selection of surgical method.更多还原