【摘要】 由于中国无明确的法律法规可据 ,亦无相应的司法解释可资运用 ,因此 ,输血感染疾病案件在法学理论界和司法实务界引起了很大的争议。争论的焦点是“血液”是否属于产品责任法中产品的范围。从各国产品责任法产品的定义、法律解释学、产品责任的归责原则等方面来分析 ,中国《产品质量法》将用于“销售”界定产品的概念是不科学的 ,应以“流通”代替之 ,因而“血液”属于产品责任法中产品的范围。更多还原

【Abstract】 Due to lack of definite laws and regulations as well as judicial interpretations concerned to be applied, the cases caused by the transfusion-infe cted diseases encourage lots of controversy not only in law theoretical circle but also in the judicial circle. The focus lies on whether the "blood" could be categorized in to products in the Products Liability Law of PRC. Analyzed in te rms of definition s of the products in the products liability laws worldwide, the legal hermeneuti cs and liability-attributing principles concerning product liabili ties, it is inappropriate for the Products Liability Law of PRC to define the products as "sell" that is supposed to be as "circulation". Thus , the blood in transfusion shoul d belong to the products in the product liability laws.更多还原