【摘要】 从冒名侵权三种不同的界定标准、其逻辑结构三类型、侵犯的不同权利及理论争鸣、笔者补充观点四方面并结合新著作权法说明冒名侵犯权利的庞杂性和强行理论分类本身及其在冒名侵权立法、司法实践中的非现实性、非必要性。通过对冒名侵权诸种绝对化立法倾向的缺陷分析,提出了立法、司法方法论、总体构思、具体方案及依据。更多还原

【Abstract】 The article tried to show the complexity of rights that false attribution infrings on, the nonreality and the non-necessity of the forced theoretical classification itself and its practice of legislation and judicature, the three style of its logical structure, the different rights which are infringed on and the theoretical contention, and author’s supplementary viewpoints. It also pays attention to the new copyright law. Then by the analysis of the flaws of sorts of difinitely legislative tendentiousness, the article offers its methodology, total framework, specific scheme and theoretical base.更多还原