节点文献

应用超声和圆锥体公式测算胆囊容积

The evaluation of the cone formula for the measurement of gallbladder volume by ultrasound

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 刘嘉林鲍世韵余小舫何文亮张励恒

【Author】 LIU Jialin,BAO Shiyun,YU Xiaofang,et al.Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery,Shenzhen People′s Hospital,Shenzhen 518020,China

【机构】 深圳市人民医院肝胆外科深圳市人民医院超声诊断科

【摘要】 目的 评价圆锥体公式计算胆囊容积的临床实用性和准确性。方法 利用B型超声测量 12例接受胆囊切除术患者术前胆囊各径线 ,分别用圆锥体公式、椭圆体公式计算胆囊容积 ,手术切除胆囊后测得容积为实际容积 ,对比分析 3种方法的测算结果 ,探讨圆锥体公式计算胆囊容积的准确性。结果 圆锥体公式计算所得的胆囊容积较椭圆体公式更为接近实际测量数值 ,两方法所计算出的胆囊容积差别有显著性意义 (P <0 .0 5 ) ;椭圆体公式计算结果与实际容积间差别有显著性意义 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,而圆锥体公式结果与实际容积间未见统计学差异 (P >0 .0 5 )。结论 圆锥体公式比椭圆体公式更接近实际容积并可以代表胆囊实际容积

【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the cone formula for the measurement of gallbladder volume by ultrasound.Methods Twelve cases of gallbladder with stones or gallbladder polypus were measured by ultrasound preoperatively,by which the gallbladder volume may be calculated using the cone formula and the ellipse formula respectively.The real gallbladder volume came from the volume of aspirated bile in gallbladder during operation.Three volumes were compared.Results The significant difference was found in gallbladder volume between the cone formula and the ellipse formula(P< 0.05 ),as well as the ellipse formula and real volume(P< 0.05 ),but no difference between the cone formula and real volume(P> 0.05 ).Conclusions The cone formula is more accurate than the ellipse formula for the measurement of gallbladder volume and closer to the real volume.

【关键词】 超声检查圆锥体公式胆囊容积
【Key words】 UltrasonographyCone formulaGallbladder volume
  • 【文献出处】 中华超声影像学杂志 ,Chinese Journal of Uitrasonography , 编辑部邮箱 ,2001年09期
  • 【分类号】R445.1
  • 【被引频次】12
  • 【下载频次】53
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络