【摘要】 花间词派的名称、风格及历史功过等问题 ,历来众说纷纭 ,莫衷一是 ,其主要症结在于未能将该派的创作纲领和创作实际即《花间集序》和《花间集》紧密结合起来 ,认真考究。其实 ,只要将两者结合起来细加考究 ,不难看出 ,该派只宜暂以“花间”命名而不宜随意易以他名 ,其主导风格只宜暂以柔靡绮丽界定而不宜随意另作界定 ,其创立的“艳科”传统敢于挑战诗歌的“言志”传统 ,把诗词创作引向开掘人的内心深层世界 ,推动诗词特别是词的创作的全面发展 ,只能是功大于过而非过大于功。更多还原

【Abstract】 The name, style, and historical merits and demerits of the Huajian Ci Poetry have got an definite conclusion yet. This is because people have not earnestly examined the school in a manner of a close combination of its creative program and practice, namely, “A Preface to the Collection of Huajian School” and the anthology per se. If we examine the school by combining these two aspects, we may see clearly that it had better be called “Huajian” instead of any other names whatsoever. Its leading style should only be defined as “soft, mild and elegant” instead of the other definitions. Since the tradition of “ yan subject” started by the school dares to challenge the tradition of “expressing ambition”, the school has led the creation of poetry, especially the ci poetry, to man’s inner life and thus brought an overall development to them. So the merits of the school is greater than its demerits and not vice versa.更多还原