节点文献

不安抗辩权与预期违约制度之比较——兼评《合同法》第68、94及108条规定

Comparison on the Right of Insecurity Pleadings and Anticipatory Breach of Contract System——Review Concurrently to the Stipulation of Article 68、94 and 108 of 《Contract Law》

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 杜进峰董红梅

【Author】 DU Jin-feng1,DONG Hong-mei2 (1.Industrial Praductions Import & Export Corporation of Shanxi Province,Taiyuan 030000,China; 2.Shanxi Finance and Economics University,Taiyuan 030006,China)

【机构】 山西省工业品进出口公司!山西太原030000山西财经大学经济研究所!030006

【摘要】 不安抗辩权是大陆法系合同法中有关合同履行的抗辩制度、预期违约制度是英美法系合同法中有关先期违约制度。通过对不安抗辩权与预期违约制度的阐释 ,采用比较法 ,对我国《合同法》第 6 8、94、10 8条之规定进行讨论 ,以期能为我国《合同法》中相关制度的完善提出些许可行的建议。

【Abstract】 The right of insecurity pleadings is in the contract law of the law system of main land concerned the pleading system of fulfiling one’s contract,however,the anticipatory breach of a contract system is in the contract law of England and the United States concerned breach of a contract in advance.In this article the authors by expounding of the right of insecurity pleadings and anticipatory breach of a contract system,adopting comparative method,discuss the stipulation of article 68,94,108 of the 《Contract Law》of our country in order to put forward some feasibility suggestions for perfecting the corresponding systems in the 《Contract law》of our country.

  • 【文献出处】 山西财经大学学报 ,Journal of Shanxi Finace and Economics University , 编辑部邮箱 ,2001年01期
  • 【分类号】D923
  • 【被引频次】3
  • 【下载频次】449
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络