【摘要】 用运动认知特质焦虑 (CCTA)量表 (CCTAI) ,运动竞赛焦虑测试 (SCAT)量表 ,以及测试CCTA归因的四个原因维度 (即控制点、稳定性、可控性、可预测性 )的量表 (CAS) ,测试运动员。运动水平、性别以及运动项目的三因素方差分析的结果显示 ,不同运动水平以及性别的CAS分数在控制点上、不同性别以及运动项目的CAS分数在可控性上、不同性别的CAS分数在可预测性上 ,分别有显著性差异。CCTAI与SCAT的相关非常显著。逐步多重回归分析的结果显示 ,CAS不能预测SCAT ,而能预测CCTAI。可预测性与CCTAI中的比赛准备焦虑负相关 ,控制点与CCTAI中的对方实力焦虑负相关。更多还原

【Abstract】 Athletes completed Competitive Cognitive Trait Anxiety (CCTA) Inventory (CCTAI), Sport Competition Anxiety Test (SCAT), and CCTA causal attribution inventory (CAS) with four causal dimensions (locus of control, stability, controllability, and predictability).The results of ANOVA of sport levels × gender×events indicated that CAS scores of different sport levels and gender on locus of control, CAS scores of different events and gender on controllability, and CAS scores of gender on predictability, were significantly different. CCTAI and SCAT significantly related. The results of stepwise multiple regressions indicated that CAS could not predict SCAT, but could predict CCTAI. Predictability of CAS and game preparation anxiety of CCTAI, and locus of control of CAS and opponent’s ability anxiety of CCTAI, negatively related.更多还原