节点文献

69例严重产后出血的诊断分析

Study of Diagnostic Method for Severe Postpartum Haemorrhage in 69 Cases

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 周春华华凯

【Author】 ZHOU Chun hua,HUA Kai (Shaoxing Hospital for Women and Children,Zhejiang 312000)

【机构】 浙江绍兴市妇幼保健院!浙江绍兴312000

【摘要】 目的 探讨严重产后出血的临床诊断方法。方法 :对 6 9例严重产后出血者采用测定出血量结合休克指数比较诊断符合率 ,观察与分娩方式的关系。结果 :测定出血量和休克指数的符合率分别为 5 9 42 %和 6 9 5 6 % ,均显著低于测定出血量结合休克指数的 89 6 8% (P <0 0 1)。三种诊断方法在阴道产和剖宫产中的诊断价值存在着不同的差异。结论 :应用测定出血量结合休克指数诊断严重产后出血 ,方法简单 ,准确性高。

【Abstract】 Objective:To study the diagnostic method for severe postpartum haemorrhage(PPH).Methods:The diagnostic accuracy for severe PPH by the measuring amount of blood loss was compared with shock index or measuring of blood loss combined with shock index in 69 cases.The relationship between the mode of delivery and the diagnostic method was analysed.Results:The accuracy in major PPH of measuring blood loss and shock index were 59 42% and 69.56% respectively, whereas the sate of combined method(89.36%) were significantly increased( P <0 01).There is a significant difference between vaginal delivery(34 cases) and cesarean delivery(35 cases) in terms of the diagnostic value of the three diagnostic methods.Conclusions:The measuring of blood loss combined with shock index is a simple and accurate method to diagnose severe PPH.

【关键词】 产后出血出血量休克指数
【Key words】 Postpartum haemorrhageBlood loss volumeShock index
  • 【文献出处】 实用妇产科杂志 ,Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology , 编辑部邮箱 ,2001年03期
  • 【分类号】R714.461
  • 【被引频次】47
  • 【下载频次】97
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络