节点文献

我国行政自由裁量权若干问题思考

Pondering over Problems with The Administrative Optional Ruling Power of Our Country

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 赵雪雁李燕萍

【Author】 Zhao Xueyan,Li Yanping (Master Degree Majorer, College of Low in Nanjing University., Nanjing 210008, China)

【机构】 南京大学法学院

【摘要】 严格规范主义与自由裁量主义的有机结合是行政自由裁量权存在的法理基础 ,而行政法所具有的成文法局限性使行政自由裁量因素的介入成为可能。我国立法中给予行政主体相当大的自由裁量权限 ,易导致行政主体滥用职权和裁量的不合理性。因此 ,应健全对行政自由裁量的法律制约机制 ,确立合理性原则作为法治原则的重要组成部分的地位 ,从原则上进行控制 ;完善行政实体法、行政程序法、行政诉讼法 ,从规则上进行控制 ;建立行政公开制度、参照先例制度等 ,从制度上实行控制

【Abstract】 The organismic connection of strict normalism with executive optionalism is the jural postulate resulting in excutive optional power. But administrative law has limitations of written code so that there exists a possibility on which the executive optional factor may get involved. The administrative systems were granted substantial ruling power in our country, which easily causes the power to be abused and to make unreasonable ruling. Therefore, it’s necessary for improving the restrict legal mechanism over executive optional ruling power so that the rational principle, as the important constituent of legal criteria, will be established, and then the administrative optional power will be controlled through principle. Meantime, it’s also necessary for bettering the executory entity law, proceeding and procedure for the control through regulations. Moreover,administrative openness and the reference to judicial precedent, etc. Ought to be established as well for the control through systems.

  • 【文献出处】 江苏公安专科学校学报 ,Journal of Jiangsu Public Security College , 编辑部邮箱 ,2001年04期
  • 【分类号】D922.1
  • 【被引频次】7
  • 【下载频次】207
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络