【摘要】 将证据定义为“客观事实”的结果 ,使证据必然具有客观性的特征。但在“证据材料”的形成和“证据材料”上升为“证据”的过程中 ,难免渗入有关人员的主观性 ,而认定证据权的依法行使 ,又使一定前提下的主观性为法律许可。悖论由此而生 :“客观性”的特征要求证据必须是客观存在的事实 ,但依法产生的证据却未必就是客观存在的事实。证据的客观性特征既不符合辩证唯物主义的认识论 ,又有悖于证据形成的法律规范 ,故应当舍弃。更多还原

【Abstract】 Evidence has the objective feature. But in the course of forming evidence materials and transferring the evidence materials to evidence, the related person’s subjective factors can easily be permeated. The objective feature demands that evidence must be objective existing facts, but evidence produced legally may not be objective existing facts. The objective feature of evidence does not conform to cognition theory, but also contradicts to legal norms. So it should be abandoned.更多还原