节点文献

硫酸沙丁胺醇缓释胶囊药代动力学和生物利用度研究(英文)

Study on Pharmacokinetics and Relative Bioavailability of A Sustained-release Preparation of Albuterol

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 王建新陈得光蔡传真李铜铃秦永平李芚

【Author】 Wang Jianxin;Chen Deguang;Cai Chuanzhen;Li Tongling;Qin Yongping and Li Tun Shanghai Institute of Chinese Materia Midica, Shanghai 200127. School of Pharmacy, West China University of Medical Sciences, Chengdu 610041, Beijing 2nd Pharmaceutical Factory,

【机构】 上海市中药研究所!上海200127华西医科大学药学院!成都 610041北京制药二厂!北京100002华西医科大学附一院临床药理研究所!成都610041

【摘要】 以英国 Glaxo Pharmaceuticals生产的沙丁胺醇控释片(Volmax, 8 mg)为参比制剂,采用随机分组交叉试验设计方法,考察 20名健康男性志愿受试者单剂量和多剂量口服成都地奥公司生产的硫酸沙丁胺醇缓释胶囊(Salbuta, 8 mg)后的药代动力学和相对生物利用度,HPLC-紫外检测器测定血浆中沙丁胺醇的浓度。用3P87药动学程序对结果进行处理。单剂量给药时,Salbuta和Volmax分别在550±0.85h和5.30±0.95 h达到峰浓度10.61±3.94ng·mL-1和10.52±2.59 ng·mL-1,血药浓度曲线下面积分别为 124.74±33.86h·ng.mL-1和 126.02±38.17h·ng·mL-1,Salbuta的相对生物利用度为98.98±12.04%。多剂量给药达稳态时,C分别为12.94±3.35ng·mL-1和12.6±3.36ng·mL.C 分别为5.84±1.34 ng·mL-1和6.16±1.33ng·mL-1,平均稳态血药浓度 Cav分别为 8.72±2.17 ng·mL-1和 8.67±2.16 ng·mL-1,波动度 DF分别为 81.82±17.74%和76.03±20.48%

【Abstract】 The pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of a sustained-release capsule of albuterol (Salbuta) made by CDDA (China) were investigated following a single and multiple oral dose given to 20 healthy male volunteers in a randomized 2-way cross-over study. The controlled-release tablet of albuterol (Volmax) made by Glaxo (U.K.) was used as reference preparation. Plasma concentration of albuterol was determined by a newly developed HPLC method with UV detection. After a single oral dose the peak concentrations Cmax were 10,6± 3.94 ng·mL-1 and 10.52±2.59 ng·mL-1 at 5.50±0.85 h and 5.30±0.95 h and the AUC0  were 124.74±33.86 h·ng· mL-1 and 126.02±38. 17 h.ng·mL-1 for Salbuta and Volmax respectively. The relative bioavailability of Salbuta was 98.98±12.04%. Following multiple dosing, mean steady state C values were 12.94±3.35 ng·mL-1 and 12.60± 3.36 ng.mL-1, mean C values were 5.84±1.34 ng.mL-1 and 6. 16±1.33 ng·mL-1, the degree of fluctuation (DF) was 81.82±17.74% and 76.03±20.48% for the two formulations respectively. The results of statistical comparison showed that the two preparations were bioequivalent.

  • 【文献出处】 Journal of Chinese Pharmaceutical Sciences ,中国药学(英文版) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2000年01期
  • 【分类号】R969.1
  • 【下载频次】104
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络