【作者】 孙佳禾； 韦红浪； 何文广；

【Author】 Sun Jiahe;Wei Honglang;He Wenguang;Shanghai University of Sport,School of psychology;Qufu Normal University,School of psychology;

【机构】 上海体育大学心理学院； 曲阜师范大学心理学院；

【摘要】 返回抑制(inhibition of return, IOR)与情绪刺激是否存在交互作用是为IOR研究中所关注的热点问题。为了深入探究情绪认知加工是否与返回抑制过程存在交互,本研究联合线索-目标范式与面孔-词Stroop任务,通过操纵范式中刺激呈现的水平和垂直空间位置分别进行了2(线索有效性:有效、无效)×2(面孔-词效价一致性:一致、不一致)的组内设计。实验1使用经典的线索-目标范式考察水平空间范式中返回抑制效应对面孔-词Stroop效应的影响,结果发现面孔-词Stroop效应和返回抑制效应之间不存在交互作用。为了探究水平空间运动所产生的Simon效应是否影响返回抑制效应,实验2将范式改为垂直空间,结果发现面孔-词Stroop效应显著,且与返回抑制效应的交互作用显著,仅在效价不一致条件下得到线索有效试次的反应速度显著慢于线索无效试次。结果表明水平空间Simon效应影响了返回抑制过程,而排除这一因素的影响后,返回抑制和情绪刺激在抑制冲突过程中对信息的加工方式存在交互。在面孔-词效价一致的条件下,对统一效价信息的加工使得返回抑制效应受到面孔-词情绪Stroop效应的压制。为了进一步探索情绪效价信息对返回抑制效应存在怎样的影响,研究对不同条件下的返回抑制效应量进行分析,结果得到积极不一致试次的返回抑制效应量显著大于消极不一致试次。这说明面孔-词Stroop范式中,处理消极信息所占用的认知资源与返回抑制认知加工过程存在竞争关系,从而减弱返回抑制效应。研究结果支持了返回抑制加工与情绪认知过程并不分离,二者存在交互作用。更多还原

【Abstract】 The interaction between inhibition of return(IOR) and emotional stimuli is a hot issue of concern in IOR research. In order to further explore whether emotional cognitive processing interacts with the process of IOR, the study combined the cue-target paradigm with the face-word Stroop task and conducted a within-group design of 2(cue validity: cued, uncued)×2(face-word valence consistency: consistent, inconsistent) by manipulating the horizontal and vertical spatial positions of stimulus presentation in the paradigm. Experiment 1used the classic cue-target paradigm to examine the IOR effect in horizontal space paradigm, and found that there was no interaction between face-word Stroop effect and IOR effect. In order to explore whether the Simon effect produced by horizontal spatial position would affect the IOR effect, experiment 2 changed the paradigm to vertical space. The results showed that face-word Stroop effect was significant, and there was a significant interaction between it and IOR effect. The reaction time of cued trials was significantly slower than that of uncued trials only under inconsistent valence conditions. The results showed that horizontal spatial Simon effect affected the IOR process, and after excluding this factor’s influence, there was an interaction between IOR and emotional stimuli in the process of inhibiting conflict. Under the condition of face-word valence consistency, processing unified valence information made the IOR effect suppressed by face-word emotional Stroop effect. In order to further explore how emotional valence information affects the IOR effect, this study analyzed the amount of IOR effect under different conditions. The results showed that the amount of IOR effect in positive inconsistent trials was significantly greater than that in negative inconsistent trials. This indicates that cognitive resources occupied by processing negative information in face-word Stroop paradigm compete with cognitive processing of IOR, thereby weakening its effect. The results further supported that IOR processing and emotional cognitive processes were not separated but interacted with each other.更多还原