节点文献
二语积极情绪词中情绪义加工的时间进程:来自ERPs的证据
The time course of affective semantic processing in L2 positive emotion word:Evidence from ERPs
【Author】 Sun Jiahe;He Wenguang;School of psychology,Qufu Normal University;
【机构】 曲阜师范大学心理学院;
【摘要】 情绪词所表达的信息可以分为两部分,分别为对客观事物或状态进行概括化描述的概念义,以及蕴含并传递情绪信息的情绪义。在母语相关研究中认为情绪义激活是自动、快速的,可以先于概念义激活;其他研究者认为情绪义加工是基于概念义加工基础之上的。本研究探讨了二语情绪词中概念义和情绪义的提取时间进程以及加工机制,有助于深入探究母语情绪词中概念义和情绪义在加工时间进程的争议,以及二语与母语之间情绪认知表征的差异性。实验借助事件相关电位技术,使用情绪启动任务,操纵二语启动词和目标词之间的时间间隔以及两者的语义相关性和效价一致性,采用3(相关性:语义相关效价一致,语义无关效价一致,语义无关效价不一致)×3(SOA:80ms,100ms,200ms)两因素被试内实验设计。对40个有效数据进行分析,行为结果显示,SOA反应时主效应显著,启动词呈现时间为80ms显著长于100ms和200ms,且100ms显著长于200ms;相关性主效应显著,语义相关效价一致和语义无关效价一致的反应时显著短于语义无关效价无关;两者交互作用不显著。脑电结果在P1成分中发现启动词呈现时间为80ms时的幅值显著低于100ms和200ms,在100ms时语义无关效价一致的幅值边缘显著大于语义相关效价一致,说明随着启动词呈现时间增长,个体获得词汇信息越多,影响对目标词的注意程度;在启动词呈现100ms时,语义相关效价一致和语义无关效价一致的N400效应显著大于语义无关效价不一致条件,这说明二语情绪信息的加工并不完全依赖概念加工。结果表明二语积极情绪词中,二语情绪义在词汇呈现80ms时未能提取,但在呈现100ms时可以对二语概念义和情绪义信息有初步的加工。由此得到,二语情绪义与母语情绪词加工模式类似,也可以在早期自动激活。但情绪义的激活需要通过语义加工获得,这一过程与概念义的获得存在交互。
【Abstract】 The information expressed by emotional words can be divided into two parts:the conceptual meaning of generalized description of objective things or states,and the emotional meaning of containing and conveying emotional information.In the study of L1 context,emotional meaning activation is automatic and fast,which can be activated before conceptual meaning,while other researchers believe that emotional meaning processing is based on conceptual meaning processing.Our study investigated the time course processing and mechanism of conceptual and affective semantic in L2 emotional words,which is helpful to further explore the time course processing of conceptual and affective semantic in L2 emotional words,and also the difference of emotional cognitive representation between L2 and L1.Using event-related potential,the experiment manipulated the time interval between the L2 priming word and the target word,as well as the semantic correlation and emotional consistency between two words.Our experiments adopted 3(correlation:semantically correlated-emotional congruence,semantically independent-emotional congruence,semantically independent-emotional incongruence) ×3(SOA:80ms,100ms,200ms) within-subject design.The analysis of 40 data shows that the main effect of SOA is significant,the presentation time of prime words is significantly longer at 80ms than 100ms and 200ms,and 100ms is significantly longer than 200ms.The main correlation effect was significant,the response time of semantically correlated-emotional congruence and semantically independent-emotional congruence were significantly shorter than semantically independent-emotional incongruence conditions.The interaction between two factors is not significant.ERP results showed that P1 amplitude of 80ms was significantly lower than 100ms and 200ms,and the amplitude of semantically independent-emotional congruence was edge significantly higher than semantically correlated-emotional congruence at 100ms,indicating that with longer presentation of primes,individuals acquired more lexical information,which affected the attention degree of target words.When SOA is 100ms,N400 effect of semantically correlated-emotional congruence and semantically independent-emotional congruence was significantly larger than semantically independent-emotional incongruence,suggesting the processing of L2 affective semantic was not entirely dependent on conceptual semantic.The results showed that in L2 positive emotion words,L2 affective semantic could not be extracted when word was presented at 80ms,but when SOA is100ms,the L2 conceptual and affective semantic information could be preliminatively processed.We concluded that the time course processing of L2 affective semantic is similar to L1 emotional word,which can be activated automatically at an early stage.But the activation of L2 affective semantic needs to be obtained through semantic processing,which interacts with the acquisition of conceptual semantic.
【Key words】 affective semantic; L2 emotion word; positive emotion; time course; ERPs;
- 【会议录名称】 第二十四届全国心理学学术会议摘要集
- 【会议名称】第二十四届全国心理学学术会议
- 【会议时间】2022-11-25
- 【会议地点】中国河南新乡
- 【分类号】B842
- 【主办单位】中国心理学会