【作者】 王超凡； 刘丽红；

【Author】 Wang chaofan;Liu lihong;Harbin Normal University Education Science College;

【机构】 哈尔滨师范大学教育科学学院；

【摘要】 建议是针对决策困难者的一种特定推荐,它可以帮助决策者从新的角度思考问题,而决策者是否采纳建议则受到多种因素的影响。实验一采用2(时间压力:高时间压力和低时间压力)×2(不确定性容忍度:高不确定容忍度和低不确定性容忍度)被试间实验设计,探究时间压力和不确定性容忍度对建议采纳的影响。实验二在实验一的基础上,采用2(不确定性容忍度:高不确定性容忍度和低不确定性容忍度)×2(建议成本:高建议成本和低建议成本)被试间实验设计,探究高时间压力条件下,建议成本和不确定性容忍度对建议采纳的影响。研究结果:实验一时间压力主效应显著(F=28.94, P<0.001),不确定性容忍度主效应显著(F=17.789, P<0.001),两者交互作用边缘性显著(F=4.112, P=0.049)。实验二不确定性容忍度主效应显著(F=36.080, P<0.001),建议成本主效应显著(F=32.668, P<0.001),两者交互作用边缘性显著(F=3.919,P=0.054)。结论:实验一表明高时间压力条件下个体的建议采纳值高于低时间压力条件下,低不确定性容忍度的个体建议采纳值高于高不确定性容忍度的个体,高时间压力下低不确定容忍度的个体建议采纳值最高,低时间压力高不确定性容忍度的个体建议采纳值最低。实验二表明高建议成本条件下建议采纳值高于低建议成本条件下,低不确定性容忍度的个体建议采纳者高于高不确定性容忍度的个体,高建议成本下低不确定容忍度的个体建议采纳值最高,低建议成本高不确定性容忍度的个体建议采纳值最低。更多还原

【Abstract】 Suggestion is a specific recommendation for people with difficulties in decision-making, which can help decision-makers to think from a new perspective, and whether decision-makers adopt suggestions or not is affected by a variety of factors. In experiment 1, a between subjects design of 2(ime pressure: high time pressure and low time pressure) × 2(Intolerance of uncertainty: high Intolerance of uncertainty and low Intolerance of uncertainty) was used to explore the influence of time pressure and Intolerance of uncertainty on the advice taking. On the basis of experiment 1, a between subjects design of 2(Intolerance of uncertainty: high Intolerance of uncertainty and low Intolerance of uncertainty) × 2(advice cost: high advice cost and low advice cost) was used to explore the influence of advice cost and Intolerance of uncertainty on advice taking under high time pressure. The results showed that in the first experiment, the main effect of time pressure was significant(F=28.94, P < 0.001), the main effect of Intolerance of uncertainty was significant(F=17.789, P<0.001). There is a certain interaction between the two factors(F=4.112, P=0.049). In experiment 2, the main effect of Intolerance of uncertainty was significant(F=36.080, P<0.001), the main effect of cost was significant(F=32.668, P<0.001), and the interaction between them was marginal(F=3.919, P=0.054). Conclusion:(1) Decision makers took more advice under high time pressure.(2) The individuals with low Intolerance of uncertainty took more advice than the highs.(3) Under high time pressure, the individuals with low Intolerance took the most advice; and the individuals with high Intolerance under low time pressure took the lowest advice.(4) Under high time pressure, decision-makers of the low Intolerance of the uncertainty took more advice than the highs.(5) High advice cost made subjects take more advice.(6) Under high time pressure and high advice cost, the individuals with low Intolerance took the most advice; and the individuals with high Intolerance under low advice cost took the lowest advice.更多还原