【作者】 王彦祥；

【Author】 Wang Yanxiang;

【机构】 北京印刷学院新闻出版学院/索引编纂研究所；

【摘要】 本文通过检索和分析GB/T 13745-2009《中华人民共和国学科分类与代码国家标准》及《学位授予和人才培养学科目录》后指出,"索引学科"至今在国家级学科目录中没有位置,因此努力将其列入学科目录将是索引人目前要完成的迫切任务。代表知识分类体系的《中图法》则是轻索引重目录,但辩证分析将"索引学"归为图书馆学情报学范畴,加快编制《索引学分类表》,与"目录学"并驾齐驱将是索引学科发展的一个必须要走的近期发展策略。至于远期发展定位,经推导论证建议将"索引学科"纳入"横断学科",进行独立性的学科建设,这更有利于我国索引学科和索引事业做大做强。最后,依据索引学的知识体系特征编制出《索引学大类分类表》,供研究者参考借鉴。更多还原

【Abstract】 After searching and analyzing GB/T 13745-2009 the National Standards for Disciplinary Classification and Code of the People’s Republic of China and the Degree granting and talent training course catalogue,we can conclude the "index discipline" has not been compiled into the national subject catalogue. Therefore, the current urgent task of the indexer is to try to promote indexing discipline included in the Discipline catalogue. The Chinese Library Classification Table, which represents the knowledge classification system, emphasizes the catalogue more than the index. The dialectical analysis classifies "Index Study" into the category of Library and Information Science. As soon as possible, the Index Study Classification Table is compiled to make it develop together with " bibliography " is a recent development strategy of indexing disciplines that must be taken. As for the long-term development orientation, it is suggested that the "index discipline" should be included in the "transverse discipline" after derivation and argumentation. The discipline construction of independence is more conducive to the expansion of the index discipline and index business. Finally, according to the characteristics of the knowledge system of indexing, the Index Study Classification Table is compiled for researchers to reference.更多还原