【作者】 王宇； 李德武； 黄东显；

【Author】 WANG Yu;LI De-wu;HUANG Dong-xian;Chang Jiang Polytechnic;Postdoctoral research station of zhongnan university of economics and law;

【机构】 长江职业学院； 中南财经政法大学博士后流动站；

【摘要】 有效提高团体标准质量一直是标准化界高度关注的话题。一个标准审核制度如果允许大量的低质量标准进入,那么该标准体系给外界的感知质量就很低,标准的平均价值也就很低,这在一定程度上限制了标准制度奖励真正创新者的能力。鉴于此,本文尝试分析审核费和审核强度对标准质量的影响,并提出一个二级审核制度。研究结果表明,单级审核制度下,审核费和审核强度的提高可以有效提高团体标准的质量,但对申请量存在不利影响;而二级审核制度可以获得不低于单级审核制度的社会福利,在提高团体标准的质量同时也能够保留标准制度对团体标准参与积极性的激励能力。更多还原

【Abstract】 The effective improvement of group standard quality has always been a topic of high concern in standardization circles.A standard examination system if a large number of low quality standard are allowed, so the perceived quality standard to the outside world is very low, the standard of the average value is very low, to some extent this restrictions on the ability of the true innovators standard system of reward.In view of this, our paper try to examination fee and examination intensity analysis of the inf luence of the standard quality, and put forward two-tiered examination system, the results show that the single-tiered examination system, the improvement of examination fee and examination intensity can effectively improve the quality of the group standard, but the application has adverse effect; however,two-tiered examination system can gain is not lower than that of single-tiered examination system of social welfare, in improving group at the same time also to preserve the quality of the standard system of group standard participation motivation.更多还原