【作者】 付阿丽； 张莹； 李雪松；

【Author】 Ali Fu;Ying Zhang;Xuesong Li;Southeast University, School of Biological Science & Medical Engineering;

【机构】 东南大学生物科学与医学工程学院；

【摘要】 为了研究汉语反语加工的认知机制,并探讨不同表达方式的反语批评对人们情绪反应的影响,本研究采用事件相关电位技术比较了直义陈述批评、反语陈述批评、直义提议批评与反语提议批评四种实验条件下脑电相关波幅的差异。结果发现:(1)相比于直义批评,被试对反语批评产生的负性情绪更为强烈。(2)汉语反语加工的认知模型较为接近模块说的观点。(3)初期加工时陈述批评相比于提议批评更容易引起被试注意,带来了更为负性的情绪体验,但在中期、后期阶段,两者之间并无差异。更多还原

【Abstract】 This study investigated irony cognitive processes and compared the differences of emotion effect between the irony and literal meaning by using Event-Related Potentials method. Based on the pragmatic features of irony, four types criticized sentences were designed: literal assertive criticism, ironic assertive criticism, literal offering criticism and ironic offering criticism, and the ERPs under these four conditions were examined. The results showed that:(1) Ironic Criticism induced significantly stronger negative emotions than Literal Criticism.(2) The cognitive model of Chinese irony processing supported the Modular Hypothesis.(3) In the early processing, Assertive Criticism attracted more attention and caused a more intense negative emotional experience, but there were no significant differences between Assertive Criticism and Offering Criticism in the middle and later processing.更多还原