【作者】 何艳玲； 张雪帆；

【Author】 He Yanling;Zhang Xuefan;

【机构】 中山大学中国公共管理研究中心； 美国亚利桑那州州立大学；

【摘要】 在尝试为公共行政学增强合法性从而解决思想危机的过程中,不同学派发展出了不同路径与策略,即管理主义:公共行政即"生意";宪政主义:公共行政即"价值规范";公民参与:公共行政即"公民权"。尽管上述学派对公共行政学思想危机的缓解做出了贡献,但公民对政府持续的不满意从实质上反映了这些学派至少在实践中远未成功。从智识层面将特定议题或群体排除出公共行政学范畴之外是产生公共行政学思想危机的重要原因。后现代公共行政可以为解决危机提供新的方向,因为在后现代公共行政中,如何使公共行政更公平和更具包容性是一个重要议题。更多还原

【Abstract】 In terms of legitimizing Public Administration studies and solving the intellectual crisis,different schools of thought have developed diverse theoretical approaches and frameworks.For example,managerialism understands public administration as a type of business;constitutionalism emphasizes public norms within administrative practice;and the school of citizen participation lauds citizenship and citizen engagement as a new legitimacy anchor of public affairs.However,citizens’ continual discontent toward government to a large extent illuminates that the aforementioned schools have not yet practically solved the crisis as what they are supposed to do.Intellectually excluding specific issues or social groups from the studies of Public Administration is a significant cause of the intellectual crisis.Since the thought of postmodern Public Administration provides a new approach to understand social equity and integration in the field of public administration,it might contribute a new theoretical thread for solving the intellectual crisis in Public Administration studies.更多还原