【作者】 邓可祝；

【机构】 安徽工业大学文法学院；

【摘要】 流域治理要避免"公地悲剧"和"集体行动困境",就需要发挥流域内各主体治理的积极性,而实行问责制是一种有效的方法。在经历了流域治理的失败后,美国切萨皮克湾和我国的太湖流域流都采取了新的措施来强化流域治理,其中一个重要方面就是实行了流域问责制。但两者的具体做法也存在差异,前者重视流域内州的责任,而后者重视公务员特别是领导类公务员的责任。认识两者的异同及其原因,对于强化流域治理的效果,具有重要意义。更多还原

【Abstract】 In order to avoid "tragedy of commons" and "dilemma of collective action" in Watershed governance, we need to play an active for each subject, and the accountability system is an effective method. After the failure of Watershed governance, the United States Chesapeake Bay and the Taihu Lake Basin have taken new measures to strengthen watershed governance, one important aspect is the implementation of the accountability system. However, there are specific differences between the two approaches, the former emphasis on the responsibility of the states, the latter emphasis the responsibility of civil servants, especially leader of civil servants. Recognizing the similarities and differences between the two and the reasons has important significance for strengthening effect of watershed management.更多还原