【作者】 江立方； 金观； 伍勤观； 王金福； 顾剑新； 施志刚；

【Author】 Jiang Lifang Yu Jinguan Wu Qinguan Wang Jinfu Gu Jianxin Shi Zhigang (Shanghai Vocational and Technical College of Agriculture $ Forestry Songjiang Shanghai 201600; Shanghai Rejuvenating Feeding Ltd Company Fengxian Shanghai 201400; Shanghai Fengxian Husbandry and Vet Station Fengxian Shanghai 201400)

【机构】 上海农林职业技术学院； 上海振兴饲料有限公司； 上海奉贤畜牧兽医站；

【摘要】 肉猪78头,随机分为三组,对照祖(空白)、试验1组(新霉素115ppm、喹乙醇100ppm、阿散酸100ppm)、试验2组(JX调理剂0．2％),试验结果表明:第一阶段:期末重,试验1、2分别高于对照组1．34千克、1．07千克,差异显著(P<0．05),试验组间差异不显著(P>0．05),第二阶段:期末重,试验1组高于对照组2．65千克差异不显著(P>0．05),试验2组高于对照组3．23千克差异显著(P<0．05),试验组间差异不显著(P>0．05);料肉比试验组均低于对照组,试验2组最低, 比对照组降低0．2,饲料转化效率提高8．97％;上呼吸道疾病对照组发病较为普遍,试验1组发病相对较少,试验2组几乎没有发病;经济效益分析表明试验2组效益最好,依次是试验1组和对照组。试验2组比对照组每头猪多盈利48．8元,比试验1组多10．28元;粪便中氮、磷含量试验2组明显下降,药物残留试验2组、对照组没有检出,试验1组猪肝阳性3个加、肉中阳性1个加。更多还原

【Abstract】 Dividing 78 hogs into three groups, comparing group (blank), experiment group NO.l (neomycin 115ppm, quinoline 100ppm, arsanilic acid 100ppm), experiment NO.2 ( (physiological amendment JX 0.2%),The results showed that in the first period the weight of experiment group NO.1 at the end of the experiment was higher 1.34kg than that of the contrast group and NO.2 was higher 1.07kg than that of the contrast group. The difference was obvious (P<0.05), The difference between the experiment groups was not obvious (P>0.05), in the second period the weight of experiment group NO.1 at the end of the experiment was higher 2.65kg than that of the contrast group and The difference was not obvious (p>0.05) and NO.2 was higher 3.23kg than that of the contrast group. The difference was obvious (P<0.05), The difference between the experiment groups was not obvious (P>0.05); The rate of feeding and meat of the experiment group was lower than that of the contrast group, NO.2 group was lower 0.2 than that of the contrast group ,it was the lowest, The feeding invert rate raised 8.97%; The upper respiratory tract diseases happened at large in the contrast group more than that of NO.1group and The upper respiratory tract diseases happened little in NO.2group. Analyzing economic benefit showed that NO.2 was the best then NO.1 the last was the contrast group. The payoff every hog in NO.2 group was more 18.8 yen than that of contrast group and 10.28 than that of NO.1 group; The content of nitrogen and phosphorus in soil decreased obviously in NO.2 group. There was no medication remain in NO.2 group and the contrast group. In NO.1 group ,the positive liver had three plus sign and the positive meat had one plus sign.更多还原