【作者】 许卓卫； 高翠南； 马舜英； 吴金瑶； 黄娥林；

【Author】 Guangzhou Chest-disease Hospital,Guangzhou,510095,China; Xu zhuowei,Gao cuinan,ma shun ying,,wujinyao,huang e ling

【机构】 广州市胸科医院；

【摘要】 目的探讨"跨区域转诊追踪"管理模式和"常规跨区转诊"管理模式对流动人口肺结核患者中断治疗的影响。方法将流动人口肺结核患者随机分为研究组和对照组,分别实施"跨区域转诊追踪"管理模式和"常规跨区转诊"管理模式的管理,然后分析两种不同管理模式对病人中断治疗率的影响。结果实施"跨区域转诊追踪"管理模式(研究组)流动人口肺结核患者中断治疗率为2.0%,"常规跨区转诊"管理模式(对照组)流动人口肺结核患者中断治疗率为9.0%,研究组病人的中断治疗率明显低于对照组(μ=3.04 P<0.01),两组有明显差异。结论 "跨区域转诊追踪"管理模式能明显降低跨区域转诊流动人口肺结核的中断治疗率。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the impact of"Cross-regional referral tracking"management and"Conventional cross-regional referral"management on interrupted treatments effect of the floating population with pulmonary tuberculosis.Methods The floating patients with TB were divided into experimental and control groups randomly,which were separately implemented of"Cross-regional referral tracking"and"Conventional cross-regional referral"managements,and then the difference of impact were analyzed.Results The 2.0%interrupted treatment rate in experimental group is lower than the 9.0%in control group(μ=3.04, p<0.01),and there was a significant difference between the two groups.Conclusions"Cross-regional referral tracking"can significantly reduce the rate of interruption of treatment on floating TB patients.更多还原