【作者】 马里奥·温宁； 林育川；

【Author】 Mario Wenning

【机构】 澳门大学； 中山大学马克思主义哲学与中国现代化研究所暨哲学系；

【摘要】 文章讨论了社会批判、规范性与语言之间的复杂关系,认为批判理论过于关注正当性问题,从而对其提出修正。首先,文章阐述了反对哈贝马斯的正当性理论——特别是他所提出的从语言中发展出一种规范性基础的观念——的诸多意见。其次,文章指出语言与规则之间的悖谬性关系,它产生于每一个语言行为中内含的普遍性与特殊性之间的紧张。最后,文章提出了对于批判理论的修正,这一修正利用了阿多诺和海德格尔的思想资源,同时也是基于下述的洞见,即语言就是"为世界解蔽",因为它提供了新的意义而不仅仅充当正当性的工具。文章表明,批判理论不能只专注于正当性的任务,而应该通过关注意义,以使对规范性的考察更为完备。为正义而奋斗与为重建意义而奋斗,构成当代批判理论的双重任务。更多还原

【Abstract】 This paper addresses the complex relationship between social criticism, normativity and language.It argues for a revision of Critical Theory and its overemphasis on questions of justification.First,a number of objections against Habermas’s theory of justification and,in particular,his conception of a normative foundation within language are being developed.Then it is ar- gued that there is an aporetic relationship between language and norms, which is due to a tension between universality and particularity in each linguistic act.Finally,the proposed revision draws on Adorno and Heidegger and is based on the insight that language is"world-disclosive"in that it provides new meaning rather dian just serving as a tool for justification.It is shown that,in order to remain viable,Critical Theory cannot confine itself with the task of justification,but has to complement its concern for normativity with a concern for meaning.The strive for establishing justice and the strive for regenerating meaning form dual tasks of contemporary Critical Theory更多还原