【作者】 李春阳；

【导师】 别荣海；

【作者基本信息】 郑州大学 ， 行政管理， 2025， 硕士

【摘要】 高校是科技成果转化政策实施的主体和创新成果的策源地,是推动国家创新体系和经济社会发展的关键环节。近年来,我国陆续出台了一系列促进高校科技成果转化的法律政策,构建起科技成果转化的制度框架。但实践层面仍存在转化渠道不畅、转化率偏低的问题,政策供给与实施效果之间存在落差。推动高校科技成果转化是一项全局性工程,其中,政府是关键的调控主体,也是政策供应端,政府的整合优势和制度化力量不可或缺,这对政策的协同性提出了更高要求。本研究聚焦高校科技成果转化的政策协同,系统阐释了高校科技成果转化、高校科技成果转化政策协同的概念内涵,深入辨析政策协同理论、政策工具理论作为本研究理论基础的作用机理,从“政策主体—政策目标—政策工具”三个维度构建了高校科技成果转化政策协同分析框架。设计了高校科技成果转化政策协同评价指标和具体赋值标准,测量了政策年度效力值、政策目标效力值、政策工具效力值,运用社会网络分析法展现了政策主体的协作关系;通过政策量化分析方法,结合高校科技成果转化实践进展,构建协同度函数分别测算了政策目标间、政策工具间的协同度,系统解析我国高校科技成果转化政策的内在协同机制与演进规律,旨在提出优化高校科技成果转化政策体系的对策建议。研究结果发现,我国高校科技成果转化政策的政策力度和数量呈阶段性上升趋势,政策的演进与专门法律的制定与修订、创新驱动发展战略的实施及国内外科技创新环境的变化相关。其次,政策主体协同以局部核心部门为主导,形成“核心—边缘”政策主体网络,呈现出一定的中心性,但在主体协同的广度与深度不足,协同网络有待进一步强化联接。在政策目标协同维度,政策目标之间的协同有差异,整体呈现出局部协同增强但长期协同不足的特征。政策目的之间的协同关系受此影响,在特定年份,个别政策目标之间的协同尤为突出。在这次工具协同维度,政策工具协同出现整体分层现象,三类政策工具存在协同难度差异,环境面工具持续主导,需求面工具长期薄弱,面临阶段性协同失调。更多还原

【Abstract】 Universities serve as the primary entities for implementing policies on the transformation of scientific and technological achievements and as hubs of innovation,playing a pivotal role in advancing the national innovation system and socioeconomic development.In recent years,China has introduced a series of laws and policies to promote the transformation of scientific and technological achievements in universities.However,their capacity for such transformation remains insufficient.Enhancing this process is a systemic endeavor,wherein the government acts as a critical regulatory body and policy supplier.The government’s integrative advantages and institutionalized authority are indispensable,necessitating higher demands for policy coordination.This study focuses on policy coordination in the transformation of scientific and technological achievements in universities.It elaborates on the concepts of"university-led transformation of scientific and technological achievements" and"policy coordination" in this context,while clarifying the theoretical foundations of policy coordination theory and policy instrument theory.A synergistic analytical framework of "policy subjects-policy objectives-policy instruments" is established.The study designs evaluation indicators and scoring criteria for policy coordination,measures annual policy effectiveness,policy objective effectiveness,and policy instrument effectiveness,and employs social network analysis to visualize collaboration among policy subjects.Through quantitative policy analysis and alignment with practical progress in university technology transfer,a coordination degree function is constructed to assess synergy between policy objectives and instruments.This systematically reveals the internal coordination mechanisms and evolutionary patterns of China’s policies,aiming to propose strategies for improving the efficiency of university-led technology transformation.Key findings include:The intensity and quantity of policies exhibit phased growth,evolving in response to the enactment/revision of specific laws,the implementation of the innovation-driven development strategy,and shifts in domestic and global innovation environments.Policy subject coordination is dominated by core departments,forming a "core-periphery" network with notable centrality,yet collaboration breadth and depth remain limited,requiring stronger interconnections.In policy objective coordination,synergy varies across objectives,showing localized improvements but long-term deficiencies.Specific years highlight pronounced synergy between certain objectives.Policy instrument coordination reveals hierarchical stratification:environmental instruments persistently dominate,demand-side instruments remain chronically weak,and phased coordination imbalances exist among the three instrument categories.更多还原