【作者】 张帆；

【导师】 韦之；

【作者基本信息】 广西师范大学 ， 法律（非法学）（专业学位）， 2025， 硕士

【摘要】 近年知识付费平台上著作权侵权现象频发,以平台为被告的诉讼案件显著增多。但平台其实际有无必要承担责任,要结合知识付费平台属性、参与度高低、具体获利模式综合认定。现有立法尚未针对知识付费平台此类混合型平台,专门划定明确的审查义务范围和著作权侵权责任判定规则。学界主要围绕知识付费平台上侵权行为规制手段和整体的著作权保护体系展开研究,缺乏平台责任分配,以及基于付费、算法推荐等因素导致的间接侵权责任承担问题的深入研究。研究拟将知识付费平台作为研究对象,辨析平台责任承担中的司法困境及背后制度成因,为合理判定知识付费平台著作权侵权责任提供建议。第一章说明知识付费平台的主体概念及平台著作权侵权责任立法现状。明确本文所研究的知识付费平台的具体主体概念范围,根据平台类型的划分标准揭示现行知识付费平台区别于传统网络内容平台的本质特征。后梳理平台著作权侵权问题可适用的现行法律依据。第二章汇总知识付费平台相关的典型案例展开实证分析,点明当前知识付费平台著作权侵权认定的实践困境。平台属性的识别模糊,影响著作权侵权责任是否成立的判断;判定平台承担间接侵权责任时,存在“明知或应知”的过错认定困境;平台知识付费服务下多元化的获利模式,导致侵权损害赔偿数额计算困难;付费服务介入加重平台司法审查义务,算法推荐技术对技术中立造成实质冲击。第三章从法理角度梳理知识付费平台著作权侵权的重点理论。过度强调平台注意义务,利益平衡机制失灵造成风险责任分配不均。有必要把握创新与知识保护之间的合理限度细化制度规定给司法裁判提供统一明确的指引。为知识付费平台著作权侵权责任承担具体制度完善做好铺垫。第四章旨在提出具体可操作的平台侵权责任、审查义务的制度完善建议。聚焦于制度落地层面的规则细化与程序设计。围绕法律条文模糊问题提出制度细化建议,围绕平台审查义务标准、技术过滤等问题给予分级承担机制考量。涉及多元赔偿机制提出可行的赔偿计算思路,希望能平衡救济效能与创新激励。更多还原

【Abstract】 In recent years,copyright infringement has occurred frequently on knowledge payment platforms,and the number of litigation cases where the platforms are defendants has increased significantly.However,whether the platform needs to bear responsibility should be comprehensively determined based on the attributes of the knowledge payment platform,the level of participation,and the specific profit model.The current legislation has not yet specifically defined a clear scope of review obligations and rules for determining copyright infringement liability for hybrid platforms such as knowledge payment platforms.The academic circle mainly researches the regulatory means of infringement behaviors on knowledge payment platforms and the overall copyright protection system,lacking in-depth studies on the allocation of platform responsibilities and the assumption of indirect infringement liability caused by factors such as payment and algorithm recommendation.The research intends to take the knowledge payment platform as the research object,analyze the judicial predicament and the underlying institutional causes in the assumption of platform liability,and provide suggestions for the reasonable determination of the copyright infringement liability of the knowledge payment platform.Chapter One explains the subject concept of knowledge payment platforms and the current legislative status of copyright infringement liability of platforms.Clarify the specific subject concept scope of the knowledge payment platform studied in this paper,and reveal the essential characteristics that distinguish the current knowledge payment platform from the traditional online content platform according to the classification criteria of platform types.Then sort out the current legal basis applicable to the copyright infringement issues of the platform.Chapter Two summarizes typical cases related to knowledge payment platforms for empirical analysis,highlighting the practical predicament of copyright infringement determination on current knowledge payment platforms.The ambiguity in identifying the attributes of the platform affects the judgment of whether the liability for copyright infringement is established.When determining that the platform bears indirect tort liability,there exists the predicament of"knowing or should have known"in fault determination.The diversified profit models under the platform’s knowledge payment services lead to difficulties in calculating the amount of infringement damages.The involvement of paid services increases the judicial review obligations of platforms,and algorithmic recommendation technology has a substantial impact on technological neutrality.Chapter Three sorts out the key theories of copyright infringement on knowledge payment platforms from the perspective of legal theory.Excessive emphasis on the platform’s duty of care and the failure of the interest balance mechanism has led to an uneven distribution of risk responsibilities.It is necessary to grasp the reasonable limit between innovation and knowledge protection,refine the institutional regulations,and provide unified and clear guidance for judicial decisions.Lay a solid foundation for the improvement of the specific system for the assumption of copyright infringement liability by knowledge payment platforms.Chapter Four aims to put forward specific and operational suggestions for improving the system of platform tort liability and review obligations.Focus on the refinement of rules and the design of procedures at the level of system implementation.Put forward suggestions for system refinement regarding the ambiguity of legal provisions,and consider the hierarchical assumption mechanism for issues such as the standards of platform review obligations and technical filtering.It involves proposing feasible compensation calculation ideas for multiple compensation mechanisms,hoping to balance the effectiveness of relief and innovative incentives.更多还原