行政公益诉讼举证责任研究

【作者】 刘鑫；

【导师】 李岩松；

【作者基本信息】 黑龙江大学 ， 法律硕士（非法学）（专业学位）， 2024， 硕士

【摘要】 随着社会的发展,技术的进步而产生许多全新的领域,这也让国家利益和公共权益的内涵伴随着发展不断地丰富,但随之而来的便是先前的权益保护手段难以满足日益丰富的国家和社会公共利益的保护形势。在此背景下行政公益诉讼制度于2017年6月27日被正式纳入法律体系,自此该制度成为保护国家和社会公共利益的重要手段。但在司法实践中逐渐暴露出了适用举证分配原则、证明标准、检察机关调查核实权、证据的司法鉴定等方面的问题。很大程度上影响了对国家和社会公共利益的有效保护,因此解决这一系列问题势在必行。本研究根据我国司法实践情况、结合法理、总结域外国家相关经验、从多方面分析问题,结合实际提出具有可操作性的解决方法,对行政公益诉讼中的举证责任进行合理的分配达到诉讼力量的平衡。建议适用一般行政诉讼举证原则、明确国家和社会公共利益损害的证明标准、明确检察机关调查核实权、进一步完善证据司法鉴定相关制度,希望提出的建议能推动行政公益诉讼制度良性发展,让国家和社会公共利益得到充分有效的保护。更多还原

【Abstract】 With the development of society,the progress of technology has produced many new fields,which also makes the connotation of national interests and public rights and interests continuously enriched with the development,but it is followed by the former means of rights and interests protection can not meet the increasingly rich situation of national and social public interests protection.In this context,the administrative public interest litigation system was formally incorporated into the legal system on June 27,2017,and since then the system has become an important means to protect the national and social public interests.However,in judicial practice,some problems are gradually exposed in the application of the principle of distribution of evidence,the standard of proof,the investigation and verification right of procuratorial organs,and the judicial appraisal of evidence.To a large extent,it has affected the effective protection of national and social public interests,so it is imperative to solve this series of problems.Based on China’s judicial practice,combined with legal principles,summarizing the relevant experience of countries outside the region,analyzing the problem from various aspects,and combining with the actual situation,this study proposes an operable solution to achieve a reasonable distribution of the burden of proof in administrative public interest litigation to achieve a balance of litigation forces.It is suggested to apply the principle of proof in general administrative litigation,clarify the standard of proof of damage to national and social public interests,clarify the right of investigation and verification of procuratorial organs,and further improve the relevant system of evidence judicial authentication.It is hoped that the suggestions put forward can promote the sound development of administrative public interest litigation system,so that national and social public interests can be fully and effectively protected.更多还原