【作者】 刘洋；

【导师】 石晶玉；

【作者基本信息】 哈尔滨商业大学 ， 民商法学， 2024， 硕士

【摘要】 对于人工智能生成物是否具有可版权性,部分学者认为其没有明确的人类作者,授予版权保护有违著作权法保护自然人创作者的传统;又有学者认为,人工智能生成物有明显的创作高度,已经是著作权法保护的对象,人工智能创作已经类似于人类的创作。在这些讨论中,人工智能究竟是不是作者,人工智能生成是否可以认为是创作,这些讨论相比于法律上更倾向于哲学层面上,人工智能是不是人这一问题从法学角度来研究颇有隔靴搔痒的感觉。人工智能是否是人的意志不是法学的研究方向,法学界更关心大量的人工智能生成物权利归属产生争议对社会造成的冲击。目前学界多从独创性的客观判断标准来判断作品的成立与否,渐渐地忽视了一开始的保护作者的天赋的卓越思想的追求。由于不再重视人在作品中的贡献仅以客观上的价值、可区别的变化等等作为作品独创性的判断依据,但是不要忘了人工智能此时依旧依照人类的意思活动,其创作的作品仍然符合人类的创作意图,人类仍旧享有作者专属的对于作品的绝对控制。那么此时的创作意图作为判断人工智能与其背后颐指气使的使用者之间究竟谁是作者就起到了关键作用。因此有必要研究创作意图在人工智能生成物究竟是否成为作品,是否能受版权保护中的作用。创作者在创作作品时应有自己的创作意图,认识到自己正在脑海中进行构思并且通过包括但不限于写作、指导甚至于选择的方式来实现自身的构思。本文从人工智能作为生成物的主体是否具有可行性、人工智能生成物作为作品的客观性判断标准、人工智能生成物作为作品的主观性判断标准以及创作意图作为作品展示创作者独特个性的方式等方面展开分析,最终本文从古籍校点、合作作品与转化型使用三个方面来体现创作意图作为超越了客观性标准部分,应成为判断独创性标准。作品是否成立,最清晰明确的标准就是最低限度的独创性,无论客观判断还是主观判断都是对这一最低限度的独创性进行判断。人工智能生成物的可版权性立足在生成物是否具有最低限度的独创性的判断上,而创作意图则是这一最低限度独创性的具体体现。更多还原

【Abstract】 Regarding whether artificial intelligence generated products have copyrightability,some scholars believe that they do not have a clear human author,and granting copyright protection violates the tradition of protecting natural person creators under copyright law;Some scholars believe that artificial intelligence products have obvious creative heights and are already protected by copyright law.Artificial intelligence creation is similar to human creation.In these discussions,whether artificial intelligence is the author or not,and whether AI generation can be considered as creation,these discussions tend to be more philosophical than legal.The question of whether artificial intelligence is human from a legal perspective is somewhat questionable.Whether artificial intelligence is human will is not the research direction of law,and the legal community is more concerned about the impact on society caused by the controversy over the ownership of the rights generated by artificial intelligence.At present,the academic community mostly judges the validity of works based on the objective criterion of originality,gradually neglecting the pursuit of excellent ideas that protect the author’s talent at the beginning.Due to the lack of emphasis on the contribution of humans in works,only objective values,distinguishable changes,etc.are used as the basis for judging the originality of works.However,it should not be forgotten that artificial intelligence still operates according to human will at this time,and the works it creates still conform to human creative intentions.Humans still enjoy absolute control over the works exclusive to the author.So the creative intention at this point plays a crucial role in determining who the author is between the artificial intelligence and the users behind it who are bossing around.Therefore,it is necessary to study the role of creative intention in whether artificial intelligence generated objects become works and whether they can be protected by copyright.Creators should have their own creative intentions when creating works,recognizing that they are brainstorming and implementing their ideas through methods including but not limited to writing,guidance,and even selection.This article analyzes the feasibility of using artificial intelligence as the main body of production,the objective judgment criteria of using artificial intelligence as a work,the subjective judgment criteria of using artificial intelligence as a work,and the way in which creative intention is used to showcase the unique personality of creators as a work.Finally,this article reflects creative intention from three aspects:ancient book proofreading,collaborative works,and transformational use.As a part that goes beyond the objective standard,it should become the criterion for judging originality.The clearest and most clear criterion for the validity of a work is the minimum level of originality,which is judged both objectively and subjectively.The copyrightability of artificial intelligence generated products is based on the criterion of whether the product has the minimum level of originality in this lifetime,and creative intention is the specific manifestation of this minimum level of originality.更多还原