【作者】 李伟；

【导师】 覃斌武；

【作者基本信息】 湘潭大学 ， 法律（法学）， 2022， 硕士

【摘要】 我国《仲裁法》并未明文规定仲裁庭追加仲裁案外第三人制度,致使在部分案件中难以合理、及时解决纠纷并最终对当事人的实体权利予以有效的保护。仲裁庭追加仲裁案外第三人能够使得当事人实体权利得到有效的保护,案件得到高效的审判,有利于纠纷的一次性解决。伴随着国际商事交易的日益复杂化,综合国内外主要仲裁机构规则的实践与经验,追加仲裁案外第三人已成为一种趋势。但在这一趋势的背后,也呈现出了一个争议与一个差异。争议为追加仲裁案外第三人是否存在学理上的争议,具体表现为是否会破坏仲裁的意思自治原则,是否会破坏仲裁的私密性,是否会损伤仲裁的经济性。差异表现为国际主要仲裁机构的仲裁规则对于追加案外第三人的标准、条件存在差异,尚缺乏统一、系统的操作标准。在学理层面,仲裁案外第三人不同于仲裁第三人、仲裁协议第三人、合并仲裁程序中的当事人。仲裁庭追加案外第三人可以与意思自治原则达到利益平衡,不会破坏仲裁的私密性,反而有利于仲裁经济性的维持。在实践层面,仲裁庭有条件地在仲裁程序中引入仲裁案外第三人具有理论依据以及实践方面的支持。在具体的考量标准方面,案外第三人的追加程序应当兼备形式和实质两大要件。首先,仲裁庭应当审查申请主体以及申请时间的限制。其次,根据仲裁案外第三人类型的不同,分别适用不同的意志考察标准。最后,即使满足上述要件,仲裁庭依然需要综合考虑案件相关情况,才可作出最终的决定。我国应当以仲裁法的修订为契机,原则性地规定追加案外第三人,并在仲裁法及司法解释中进一步明确仲裁协议效力扩张的几类典型情形,吸收国内外仲裁实践中发展较为成熟的规则,如代理、债权人代位求偿等。更多还原

【Abstract】 China’s "Arbitration Law" does not expressly provide for the system of adding a third party outside the arbitration case to the arbitration tribunal,which makes it difficult to reasonably and timely solve disputes in some cases and finally effectively protect the substantive rights of the parties.The addition of a third party outside the arbitration case by the arbitration tribunal can effectively protect the substantive rights of the parties,and the case can be tried efficiently,which is conducive to the one-time settlement of disputes.With the increasing complexity of international commercial transactions,it has become a trend to add a third party to the arbitration case based on the practice and experience of the arbitration rules of major arbitration institutions at home and abroad.But behind this trend,there is also a dispute and a difference.The dispute is whether there is a theoretical dispute over the addition of a third party outside the arbitration case,which is specifically reflected in whether it will undermine the principle of autonomy of will,whether it will undermine the privacy and economy of arbitration.The difference shows that the arbitration rules of major international arbitration institutions have differences in the standards and conditions of adding a third party outside the case,and there is still a lack of unified and systematic operation standards.At the academic level,the third party outside the arbitration case is different from the third party of arbitration,the third party of arbitration agreement and the parties in the consolidated arbitration procedure.The addition of a third party outside the case by the arbitration tribunal can achieve a balance of interests with the principle of autonomy of will,which will not destroy the privacy of arbitration,but is conducive to the maintenance of the economy of arbitration.In practice,the arbitral tribunal conditionally introduces a third party outside the arbitration case into the arbitration procedure,which has the support of theory and practice.In terms of specific consideration standards,the additional procedure of the third party outside the case should have both formal and substantive elements.First,the arbitration tribunal should examine the subject of the application and the time limit of the application.Secondly,according to the different types of the third party outside the arbitration case,different will inspection standards are applicable.Finally,even if the above requirements are met,the arbitral tribunal still needs to comprehensively consider the relevant circumstances of the case before making a final decision.China should take the amendment of the arbitration law as an opportunity to stipulate in principle the addition of a third party outside the case,further clarify several typical situations of the expansion of the effectiveness of the arbitration agreement in the arbitration law and judicial interpretation,and absorb the more mature rules developed in domestic and foreign practice,such as agency,creditor’s subrogation and so on.更多还原