【作者】 赵静；

【导师】 陶维东；

【作者基本信息】 西南财经大学 ， 法律硕士（非法学）（专业学位）， 2023， 硕士

【摘要】 行政法律关系中,行政行为论的长期盛行与孤立静态的行政法理念、法安定性和保障行政权效率等,使得行政权所作用的一方相对于行政机关始终处于极度弱势的一方。随着行政法律关系的现代化、复杂化、动态化,多阶段多主体多程序间,具备关联关系的诸行政行为侵犯公民权利的现象愈加频繁,如城乡规划、房屋征收、行政许可、税务处罚等领域。诚然,我国《行政诉讼法》历经三版,在受案范围、起诉期限等方面已多有松动,但涉关联关系的行政行为间因参与主体多、行为期间长、侵权隐蔽性高而极具特殊性。在现行法律框架下,最终行政行为本身无瑕疵但在先的行政行为存在瑕疵情形下如何处理,只在行政许可领域有明确规定。在无统一且明确的法律依据与操作规范下,频现的此类纠纷往往存在完全冲突的解决路径和完全矛盾的结果,如此对于私权救济、公权之行政行权规范、公权之司法裁判可信度都极为不利。目前,实务界往往持回避态度,要求争议间分别救济,辅之以中止诉讼等程序。就关联行政行为间,行政行为论下纠纷分别救济,行政过程论下关注整体间的关联,相较而言后者更有助于解决此类问题的效率追求与正义探寻。问题视角之行政过程论有助于正确看待争议对象之关联行政行为,而作为舶来品的行政行为违法性继承可以提供体系化的解决路径。就关联行政行为,理论界研究和逐渐承认行政违法性继承,实务界探索和逐渐适用违法性继承,表现出违法性继承存在的价值。行政权争讼的部分领域可资适用确实提供了思路借鉴,但“域外法理论、中国化适用”的真正实现还亟待努力。关联行政行为的判定标准如何?适用违法性继承的范围和尺度何在?若可资审查如何协调现行立法关于起诉和管辖方面的矛盾?判决结果是否需要对非“本案”的争讼对象做出回应?诸如此类的问题尚未得到统一且明确的回答。要实现在中国体系化的司法适用完善,仍需努力。笔者遵循“理念引入——个案与类案分析——案例评析与法域可行性展示——制度完善展望”的思路,综合运用文献研究法、比较法研究、案例分析法等,力求以行政行为违法性继承论为主,相关理论为辅,从司法角度提出如何完善违法性继承论的中国化适用制度的建议。法律是一门平衡的艺术,本文所探讨和追求的,并非是在关联行政行为中,一味追求行政行为的违法性继承,在明晰适用对象和提高适用标准的情形下,探寻在现行法律规定和司法审查模式下创新,在行政机关公定力维护和行政相对人权利救济、实质正义与程序公正等多种价值冲突间寻求平衡。更多还原

【Abstract】 In administrative legal relations,the long-term prevalence of administrative behavior theory and isolated static administrative law concept,legal stability and guarantee the efficiency of administrative power,so that the role of the administrative power of the party relative to the administrative organs are always in a very weak party.With the modernization,complexity and dynamism of the administrative legal relationship,the phenomenon of infringement of citizens’ rights by multi-stage,multi-body and multi-procedure administrative acts with associated relations has become more and more frequent,such as urban and rural planning,housing expropriation,administrative license,tax penalties and other fields.It is true that China’s "Administrative Procedure Law" after three editions,in the scope of the case,the prosecution period has been much relaxed,but the administrative acts involved in the relationship between the many subjects involved,the behavior of the long period,the infringement of high concealment and very special.Under the current legal framework,the final administrative act itself is not defective,but the prior administrative act is defective,only in the field of administrative licensing has clear provisions.In the absence of a unified and clear legal basis and operational norms,such disputes often have completely conflicting paths and contradictory results,which is extremely detrimental to the private remedy,the administrative power of public authority,and the credibility of public authority judicial decisions.At present,the practice community tends to avoid the posture,requiring separate relief between disputes,supplemented by the suspension of litigation and other procedures.In terms of related administrative acts,the administrative act theory under the dispute relief separately,the administrative process theory is concerned about the overall connection,the latter is more helpful to solve the efficiency of such issues and the search for justice.The problematic administrative process theory can help to correctly view the related administrative acts of dispute,while the imported administrative act of illegality succession can provide a systematic solution path.Theoretically,administrative succession of illegality has been gradually recognized,and the practical community has explored and gradually applied the succession of illegality,which shows the value of the existence of succession of illegality.The application of some areas of administrative power litigation does provide a reference for ideas,but the real realization of "extraterritorial law theory,Chinese application" still needs to be worked on.What are the criteria for determining affiliated administrative acts? What is the scope and scale of the application of illegality succession? How to reconcile the contradiction between the existing legislation on prosecution and jurisdiction if it can be reviewed? Does the decision need to be responsive to those who are not "the case" ? Questions such as these have not yet been answered uniformly and clearly.There is still work to be done in order to achieve systematic judicial application in China.The author follows the approach of "introduction of concept-analysis of individual cases and similar cases-case review and demonstration of the feasibility of the jurisdiction-prospect of system improvement".The author follows the idea of "introduction of the concept-case and case analysis-case review and demonstration of the feasibility of the jurisdiction-prospect of improving the system" and uses literature research,comparative law research and case analysis to propose how to improve the Chinese application system of the doctrine of succession of illegality from the judicial perspective,mainly based on the doctrine of succession of illegality of administrative acts and supplemented by related theories.What this paper explores and pursues is not to pursue the succession of illegality of administrative acts in the related administrative acts,but to explore the innovation in the existing legal provisions and judicial review mode under the circumstances of clarifying the applicable objects and improving the applicable standards,and to seek a balance between the conflicts of values such as the maintenance of public power of administrative organs and the relief of the rights of administrative relatives,substantive justice and procedural justice.更多还原