【作者】 张晓明；

【导师】 刘军；

【作者基本信息】 东北大学 ， 技术经济及管理， 2021， 硕士

【摘要】 中国将全力迈进创新驱动。城市创新作为国家创新系统的重要组成部分,构成了国家经济和科技发展的重要基础。2006年初,中国首次明确了建设创新型国家的发展目标。自中国提出建设创新型国家的重大战略以来,建设创新型城市一直是区域化经济发展的重要热点问题。中心城市和城市群正在成为承载发展要素的主要空间形式,增强中心城市和城市群等经济发展的优势区域的经济和人口承载力,在发展中营造平衡。围绕中心城市和城市群实施区域协调发展战略成为新时代下中国区域经济发展的重要特征。中心城市作为区域经济发展动力主体,也纷纷提出建设创新型城市的目标,在贯彻落实创新型城市战略的过程中需要中心城市发挥在区域协调中的带领作用和国家创新体系中的支撑作用,不断提升城市自主创新能力,努力实现经济发展方式的二次转型。因此,全面分析创新驱动下的中心城市创新能力水平,对增强城市的自主创新能力和推动经济发展模式的转化,以及推进中国创新型国家目标的快速实现都具有着重要意义。构建科学、有效的中国中心城市创新力评价指标体系是部署城市创新各要素有效聚集、流动,推进城市创新战略实施的重要基础,一方面有利于科学度量中国中心城市创新的进展,为城市创新进程指导提供量化管理依据;另一方面,对中国中心城市有利于总结发现城市创新进程中的实践经验和存在问题,并提出相应对策和建议。为此,论文首先梳理了相关研究文献,界定了中心城市创新力的涵义,以中国中心城市为研究对象,在梳理现有研究成果和实践经验的基础上,从创新资源、创新环境、创新绩效3个方面,筛选出12个三级指标和30个四级指标,构建出中国中心城市评价指标体系,并运用该评价指标体系对19个城市群的46个中心城市进行了实证评价分析。论文的主要研究结论包括:(1)就四大区域及城市群而言,中国中心城市创新格局在地域上仍旧呈现出“东强西弱”的态势,沿海地区城市保持着更为良好的创新发展趋势。珠三角、长三角、京津冀城市群中心城市创新力水平的领先优势较为明显,成渝、关中、中原城市群中心城市的创新能力处于中等水平,长江中游、哈长、北部湾等城市群的中心城市创新能力则相对较弱。(2)各城市群内部虽多为“一核多心”的局面,但是主副中心城市创新力水平差距明显,且多副中心之间也仍有差距。除北京、上海、广州、深圳头部中心城市创新力各要素发展比较均衡外,其他中心城市各创新要素普遍不均衡,但具备各自的发展优势。根据以上中国中心城市研究所得出的结论,结合中心城市创新力水平特点和存在的问题,有针对性提出一些建议:首先,面对中国中心城市创新力发展不平衡特征的问题,相关部门要有补齐短板意识,对于一些创新力薄弱的中心城市,发掘自身的发展优势,建设成具有主体特色创新型城市提高城市创新力;其次,除了对能力短板进行弥补以外,更需要依据创新比较优势,推进创新链协同,以优化城市群整体创新绩效,同时要注意虹吸效应,防止两级分化。最后,提高城市创新力需要政府、企业、高校等乃至整个社会协同发力。加强产学研合作,促进创新成果转化,推动产业升级,实现经济转型。更多还原

【Abstract】 China will make every effort to be driven by innovation.As an important part of the national innovation system,urban innovation constitutes an important foundation for national economic and technological development.At the beginning of 2006,for the first time,China made clear the development goal of building an innovative country.Since China proposed a major strategy for building an innovative country,building an innovative city has always been an important hot topic in regional economic development.Central cities and urban agglomerations are becoming the main spatial forms that carry development factors,enhancing the economic and population carrying capacity of advantageous regions such as central cities and urban agglomerations for economic development,and creating a balance in development.The implementation of regional coordinated development strategies around central cities and urban agglomerations has become an important feature of China’s regional economic development in the new era.As the main body of regional economic development,central cities have also put forward the goal of building innovative cities.In the process of implementing the innovative city strategy,central cities need to play a leading role in regional coordination and a supporting role in the national innovation system.Enhance the city’s independent innovation capability,and strive to achieve the second transformation of the economic development mode.Therefore,a comprehensive analysis of the level of innovation-driven central cities’ innovation capabilities is of great significance for enhancing the city’s independent innovation capabilities and promoting the transformation of economic development models,as well as promoting the rapid realization of China’s innovative country goals.Constructing a scientific and effective evaluation index system for the innovation power of China’s central cities is an important foundation for deploying the effective aggregation and flow of various elements of urban innovation,and promoting the implementation of urban innovation strategies.On the one hand,it is conducive to scientifically measuring the progress of innovation in China’s central cities,and for the process of urban innovation.Guidance provides a basis for quantitative management;on the other hand,it is helpful for China’s central cities to summarize and discover practical experience and existing problems in the process of urban innovation,and propose corresponding countermeasures and suggestions.To this end,the thesis first combed the relevant research literature and defined the meaning of central city innovation.Taking China’s central cities as the research object,based on the existing research results and practical experience,the paper analyzes innovation resources,innovation environment,and innovation performance.In 3 aspects,12 three-level indicators and 30 four-level indicators were screened out to construct an evaluation index system for China’s central cities.The evaluation index system was used to conduct empirical evaluation and analysis on 46 central cities in 19 urban agglomerations.The main research conclusions of the thesis include:(1)As far as the four major regions and urban agglomerations are concerned,the innovation pattern of China’s central cities still shows a trend of "strong in the east and weak in the west" geographically,and cities in coastal areas maintain a more favorable trend of innovative development.The innovation capability of central cities in the Pearl River Delta,Yangtze River Delta,and Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomerations is relatively obvious.The innovation capabilities of the central cities in ChengduChongqing,Guanzhong,and Central Plains urban agglomerations are at a medium level.The urban agglomerations in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River,HarbinChangzhou and Beibu Gulf etc.The innovation ability of the central cities of China is relatively weak.(2)Although most of the urban agglomerations are in a situation of "one core and multiple centers",there is a significant gap in the level of innovation between the main and sub-center cities,and there is still a gap between multiple sub-centers.With the exception of Beijing,Shanghai,Guangzhou,and Shenzhen,the development of the innovation factors of the head central cities is relatively balanced,and the innovation factors of other central cities are generally uneven,but they have their own development advantages.Based on the above conclusions drawn by the China Central City Research Institute,combined with the characteristics and existing problems of the central city’s innovation capacity,some targeted suggestions are put forward:First,in the face of the imbalanced characteristics of the development of China’s central cities’ innovation capacity,relevant departments must have To make up for shortcomings awareness,for some central cities with weak innovation ability,explore their own development advantages,build them into innovative cities with main characteristics to improve urban innovation;secondly,in addition to making up for shortcomings,it is necessary to compare innovation based on innovation.Advantages,promote the synergy of the innovation chain to optimize the overall innovation performance of the urban agglomeration,and at the same time pay attention to the siphon effect to prevent two levels of differentiation.Finally,to improve the city’s innovation capacity requires the concerted efforts of the government,enterprises,universities,and even the entire society.Strengthen industry-university-research cooperation,promote the transformation of innovation achievements,promote industrial upgrading,and realize economic transformation.更多还原