【作者】 周红梅；

【导师】 李敏；

【作者基本信息】 四川大学 ， 公共管理（专业学位）， 2021， 硕士

【摘要】 新形势下,党中央和国务院高度重视国资监管和国企改革工作。习近平主席多次作出重要指示批示。为更好贯彻落实国企改革“1+N”政策体系部署,党中央和国务院作出了实施国企改革三年行动的部署,明确提出要完善符合中国特色社会主义市场经济体制的国企现代企业制度,推行经理层市场化选聘和契约化管理,探索职业经理人制度建设。同时,要求各级国资委要研究出台指导意见并狠抓各项责任落实。国企职业经理人的选聘和退出是推行职业经理人制度的重要内容,在国资委要建立健全国有企业选人用人监管制度的宏观要求背景下,研究优化国资委对国企职业经理人选聘和退出的监管,既是符合“使市场在人力资源配置中起决定性作用”政策部署的大势所趋,也是顺应“提高国资运营效率、增强国有企业发展活力”改革要求的时下工作所需。近年来,在B市委市政府坚决贯彻党中央对国企改革三年行动中关于指导国企推行职业经理人制度的决策部署的指导下,B市国资委在对市属国企职业经理人选聘与退出的监管方面进行了一些路径探索。在监管制度建设、监管方式改进、监管基础强化、监管重点把控和监管难点突破方面进行了一些路径探索,并在促进国企人力资源优化配置、激发国企干部干事创业活力和提升国有资本经营效益方面取得了一定成效,但也存在着监管制度不健全、监管基础支撑不完善、市场化选聘和退出的监管要求执行不到位、整合国企与职业经理人需求的监管效果较差的问题。本文按照”发现问题——分析问题——解决问题”的研究思路,采用文献研究法、问卷调查法和对比分析法,在对国资委、国企职业经理人、选聘与退出的概念进行阐释和对国资监管理论、新公共管理理论和委托代理理论进行分析的基础上,根据B市的具体情况设计出调查问卷,对B市国资委对国企选聘和退出职业经理人的监管现状进行调查,发现存在的监管问题并分析原因。同时结合目前从公开信息途径中能够查询到的和自身工作中涉及的关于国内外国资监管机构对国企职业经理人选聘和退出监管的实践,对比并总结经验做法,针对存在的问题和分析的原因,提出完善B市国资委对国企职业经理人选聘与退出监管的对策,要着眼于优化监管内容,即优化对国企职业经理人选聘与退出监管内容。同时要完善监管体系,一是着力夯实监管支撑基础;二是要科学构建监管制度体系;三是要科学构建党管人才和市场化选人用人的契合机制;四是要科学构建国企职业经理人的市场化流动机制;五是要大胆探索国企职业经理人契约化管理的退出机制;六是要科学构建国企职业经理人人才库共建共享机制。本文的研究能够为B市国资委改进对国企职业经理人选聘和退出的监管提供参考。更多还原

【Abstract】 Under the new circumstances,the CPC Central Committee and the State Council attach great importance to the supervision of state-owned assets and the reform of state-owned enterprises.President Xi Jinping has repeatedly issued important directives and instructions.In order to implement the "1 + N" policy system of state-owned enterprise reform better,the CPC Central Committee and the State Council have made a three-year plan for implementing state-owned enterprise reform.It is clearly proposed to improve the modern enterprise system of stateowned enterprises in line with the Socialist market economy system with Chinese characteristics,to carry out the market-based selection and contract management of managers,and to explore the construction of the professional manager system.At the same time,the state-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission at all levels is required to study and issue guidance and implement various responsibilities.The selection and withdrawal of professional managers in stateowned enterprises is an important part of the implementation of the professional manager system.In the context of the SASAC’s macro requirements to establish and improve the supervisory system for the selection and employment of personnel in state-owned enterprises,to study and optimize the supervision of SASAC over the recruitment and withdrawal of professional managers in state-owned enterprises is not only in line with the general trend of the policy of "making the market play a decisive role in the allocation of Human Resources",it is also necessary for the current work to comply with the reform requirements of "improving the operating efficiency of state-owned assets and enhancing the development vitality of stateowned enterprises".In recent years,under the guidance of the Party Central Committee and the municipal government of B City,which resolutely carried out the decision-making and deployment of the state-owned enterprise reform in the three-year campaign to guide the state-owned enterprise to implement the professional manager system,the state-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission(SASAC)of B city has explored some ways to supervise the selection and withdrawal of professional managers of state-owned enterprises.In the supervision system construction,the supervision way improvement,the supervision foundation enhancement,the supervision key control and the supervision difficulty breakthrough aspect has carried on some paths exploration,and it has made certain achievements in promoting the optimal allocation of human resources in state-owned enterprises,stimulating the entrepreneurial vitality of cadres and officers in state-owned enterprises,and promoting the operating efficiency of state-owned capital,but there are also some problems such as the imperfect supervision system,the imperfect support of the Supervision Foundation,the inadequate implementation of the supervision requirements of the market-based recruitment and withdrawal,and the poor supervision effect of integrating the needs of state-owned enterprises and professional managers.According to the research idea of "finding problems-analyzing problems-solving problems",this paper adopts the methods of literature research,questionnaire survey and comparative analysis.On the basis of explaining the concepts of state-owned assets supervision and administration commission,professional managers of state-owned enterprises,selection and withdrawal,and analyzing the theories of state-owned assets supervision,new public management and principal-agent,the questionnaire was designed according to the specific situation of B city.This paper investigates the supervision status of B’s state-owned assets supervision institutions on the selection and withdrawal of professional managers in state-owned enterprises,find the existing regulatory problems and analyze the reasons.At the same time,using the public information from work and Internet at home and abroad about the practice of supervising,put forward to suggestions by comparing and summing up the experiences and practices.We should focus on optimizing the content of supervision,that is,optimizing the selection and withdrawal of professional managers in state-owned enterprises.At the same time,we should perfect the supervision system,firstly,we should lay a solid foundation for supervision,secondly,we should build a scientific supervision system,thirdly,we should build a scientific conjunction mechanism between the Party’s management of talents and the market-oriented selection and employment of talents Fourth,we should scientifically construct the market-oriented flow mechanism of professional managers in state-owned enterprises;Fifth,we should explore the withdrawal mechanism of contractual management of professional managers in state-owned enterprises;sixth,we should scientifically construct the sharing mechanism of professional managers talent pool.更多还原