节点文献
行政协议中行政机关的单方解除权研究
Study on the Unilateral Termination Right of the Administrative Organs in the Administrative Agreement
【作者】 王燕;
【作者基本信息】 燕山大学 , 法律硕士(法学)(专业学位), 2022, 硕士
【摘要】 合作理念下,因行政协议具有的行政性和合意性,行政协议成为政府柔性行政管理的重要方式。行政协议的行政性赋予行政机关优先于相对人的单方解除权,作为行政优益权的单方解除权,由行政机关单独享有,与合同解除权的双方共享并不不同,需要厘清这两项概念的区别,清晰界定单方解除权的权力属性,从根源上规范行政机关单方解除权的行使。对行政机关单方解除权的研究,有利于避免行政机关滥用权力,保障行政相对人合法权益,实现诚信政府、法治政府的建设,推动行政协议的实践发展。通过实证分析方法,刨析当前行政机关单方解除权的实然样貌,发现我国行政机关单方解除权的行使还存在以下问题。行政机关漠视单方解除程序,滥用公共利益,司法机关对单方解除权认定不一,行政优益权与合同解除权相竞合,对相对人补偿标准不明确,履行之诉与撤销之诉同案交织。这些问题的产生既有理论认识上的差异,也有立法规范的不足。本文从立法规范和司法审查角度,提出行政机关单方解除权的完善建议。立法层面,适用正当程序原则,遵循有逻辑顺序的整套单方解除程序,包括先行协商制度、告知制度、单方解除听证制度和配套的信息公开和书面通知制度。同时,合理界定公共利益,确立单方解除复议制度。司法层面,加大比例原则适用的司法审查,优先适用合同解除权,落实单方解除事后补偿制度,构建履行之诉一并审理机制,加强诉讼调解制度的适用。
【Abstract】 Under the concept of cooperation,administrative agreement has become an important way of government flexible administrative management due to the administrative and satisfactory nature of administrative agreement.Administrative agreement of administrative organs give priority to the counterpart of unilateral authority,as administrative rights of unilateral rights,enjoyed by the administrative organ alone,and the contract of the sharing is not different,need to clarify the difference between the two concepts,clearly define the power of unilateral power,standardize the exercise of unilateral authority from the root.The study on the unilateral termination of the power of administrative organs is conducive to avoiding the abuse of power by administrative organs,protecting the legitimate rights and interests of administrative counterparts,realizing the construction of an honest government and a law-based government,and promoting the practical development of administrative agreements.Through the empirical analysis method,and analyzing the actual appearance of the current administrative organs,it is found that the following problems still exist in the exercise of the current administrative organs.The administrative organ ignores the unilateral termination procedure and abuses the public interests.The judicial organ determines the right of unilateral termination,the administrative superior right and the contract termination right match,the compensation standard for the counterpart is not clear,and the action of performance and the case of cancellation litigation are intertwined.The emergence of these problems has both the differences in theoretical understanding and the lack of legislative norms.From the perspective of legislative norms and judicial review,this paper puts forward the improvement of the right of administrative organs.At the legislative level,the principle of due process is applied,and the logical order set of unilateral termination procedures is followed,including the first consultation system,notification system,unilateral termination hearing system and supporting information disclosure and written notification system.At the same time,the public interest should be reasonably defined and the unilateral termination of the reconsideration system should be established.At the judicial level,increase the judicial review of the principle of proportion,give priority to the right of contract termination,implement the compensation system after unilateral termination,build a trial mechanism for the performance of litigation,and strengthen the application of the litigation mediation system.
【Key words】 Administrative agreement; unilateral termination; administrative superiority right; due process; legality review;
- 【网络出版投稿人】 燕山大学 【网络出版年期】2023年 02期
- 【分类号】D922.1